Home • PRRES Inc. Journal • Read the Journal

“Location Location Location” Wise Maxim or Clever Hoax?

Author/s: Gregory J Costello, Russell Elkins

Date Published: 1/01/2000

Published in: Volume 6 - 2000 Issue 1 (pages 25 - 35)

Abstract

Median prices for individual suburbs in Australian capital cities are frequently quoted in the popular press as a measure of price change between geographic areas. This raises several interesting questions. Are these observed price changes truly representative of factors influencing prices autonomous within the specific suburb? Alternatively, are these changes the result of common factors that may be observed across several suburban areas during contemporaneous measurement periods? Are these reported price changes of any statistical significance? This paper empirically tests some of these questions. A rich data set of transactions for ten individual suburbs in the city of Perth, Australia for the period 1988 – 1999 is used. Quarterly hedonic price indexes are created for each individual suburb and tested for accuracy. Standard parametric and non-parametric statistical methods are used to test for significant differences between the ten suburb groupings. The results confirm a low number of statistically significant differences and the existence of a ‘pricing size effect’ as a determinant of house price change.

Download Full Article

Download the Full Article PDF

14445921.2000.11104081.pdf 14445921.2000.11104081.pdf (1MB)

Keywords

Hedonic Price Indexes - House Price Indexes - Location Theory - Median Price Indexes - ‘Abnormal’ Price Changes

References

  • Case, K. E., Shiller, R.J. (1989). “The Efficiency of the Market for Single-Family Homes,” The American Economic Review 79, 125–137.
  • Clapp, J.M., Dolde, W., Tirtiroglu, D. (1995). “Imperfect Information and Investor Inferences from Housing Price Dynamics,” Real Estate Economics, Fall 1995, Vol 23 No 3,239–269.
  • Clapp, J.M., Giacotto, C., Tirtiroglu, D. (1991). “Housing Price Indexes Based On All Transactions Compared to Repeat Subsamples,” Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association 19 (3):270–285.
  • Costello, G.J. (1995). “Shift-share analysis for Real Estate Market Research.” Australian Land Economics Review. Vol 1 No 2, 24–33.
  • Costello, G.J. (1997). “Transaction Based Index Methods for Housing Market Analysis.” Australian Land Economics Review. Vol 3 No 219–27.
  • Costello, G.J. (1999). “Price Segmentation, Size Effects and Information Diffusion in Housing Markets.” Proceedings of the International Real Estate Society Conference ‘99, Kuala Lumpur, 26–30 January 1999.
  • Dolde, W., Tirtiroglu, D. (1997). “Temporal and Spatial Information Diffusion in Real Estate Price Changes and Variances,” Real Estate Economics, Winter 1997, Vol 25 No 4, 539–565.
  • Gatzlaff, D. H., Ling, D.C. (1994). “Measuring Changes in Local House Prices: An Empirical Investigation of Alternative Methodologies,” Journal of Urban Economics. 35: 221–244.
  • Gatzlaff, D.H., Tirtiroglu, D. (1995). “Real Estate Market Efficiency: Issues and Evidence.” Journal of Real Estate Literature, Vol 3, No 2, pp 157 189.
  • Linneman, P. (1980). “Some Empirical Results on the Nature of the Hedonic Price Function for the Urban Housing Market.” Journal of Urban Economics. 8:47–68.
  • Meese, R., Wallace, N., (1995) “Testing the Present Value Relation for Housing Prices: Should I Leave My House in San Francisco?” Journal of Urban Economics 35(3): 254–266.
  • Siegel, S., Castellan, N.J. (1988). Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, McGraw Hill, New York, 1988
  • Squirrell, ?. (Ed) (1997) “Readings in Property Economics” Australian Institute of Valuers and Land Economists (Inc), Canberra, Australia.