A Review of the Georgist Tax Remedy for Australia

Author/s: Garrick Small

Date Published: 1/01/2000

Published in: Volume 6 - 2000 Issue 2 (pages 46 - 51)

Abstract

Rent theory has been associated historically with the suggestion that land rent is a most suitable basis for public funding, giving rise to the single tax movement of Henry George. The political fortunes of the latter have been singularly unfavourable, and have tended to draw attention away from systematic study of rent theory. The recent trend in many texts has been to enumerate a set of shortcomings with rent theory that often owes more to a provincial rejection of the single tax proposal than to an informed and balanced critique of the apparent target. This paper reviews the fundamental political economy of land tax with special reference to Australia to demonstrate a separate set of shortcomings, not associated with rent theory. In this way the political impracticality is explained without challenging the validity of rent theory.

Download Full Article

Download the Full Article PDF

14445921.2000.11104089.pdf 14445921.2000.11104089.pdf (575kB)

Keywords

Henry George - Land Tax - Property Theory - Rent Theory - Tax Reform

References

  • Barlow, Raliegh. 1958. Land Resource Economics. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
  • Belloc, Hillaire. 1937/1973. The Crisis of Civilisation. Rockport USA: Tan.
  • Brennan, Frank. 1971. Canberra in Crisis. Fyshwick, ACT: Dalton.
  • Charles, George. 1991. Elementary Economics. Melbourne: Henry George Foundation.
  • Chesterton, G,K. 1917/1951. A Short History of England, The New Phoenix Library. London: Chatto & Windus.
  • Cobbett, William. 1824/1988. A History of the Protestant Reformation in England and Ireland. Rockford, Illinois: Tan.
  • Dowe, W. A. True and False Economics. Sydney.
  • Ford, A. G. 1960. Notes of the working of the gold standard before 1914. Oxford Economic Papers 1960 (February):52–76.
  • George, Henry. 1879/1992. Progress and Poverty: Schalkenbach.
  • Grieder, William. 1987. Secrets of the Temple. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Harrison, Fred. 1983. The Power in the Land. New York: Universe.
  • Harvey, Jack. 1987. Urban Land Economics. London: Macmillan.
  • Kavanagh. 1995. The Recovery Myth. Melbourne.
  • Kieve, Paul N. Balchin & Jeffery L. 1977. Urban Land Economics. London: Macmillan.
  • Mill, J.S. 1848/1970. The principles of Political Economy. D. Winch (ed.). Harmondworth, Middlesex: Penguin Classics.
  • Panico, Carlo. 1988. Interest and Profit in the Theories of Values and Distribution. Houndsmills, UK: Macmillan.
  • Peace, J. W. Graham. 1933. The Great Robbery. London: Commweal Press.
  • Pearce, H. G. 1987. Value True and Morbid. 2 ed. Sydney: Link.
  • Ricardo, David. 1817/1973. The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. Dutton NY: Everyman.
  • Rogers, James Thorold. 1884/1949. Six Centuries of Work and Wages. London: George Allen and Unwin.
  • Samuelson, Paul, A. 1973. Economics. 2 ed. Sydney: McGraw Hill.
  • Small, G.R. 1997a. A Comparative Analysis of Contemporary Native and Ancient Western Cultural Attitudes to Land. Paper read at Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference, at Massey University, New Zealand.
  • Small, G. R. 1997b. A Cross Cultural Economic Analysis of Customary and Western Land Tenure. AIVLE: The Valuer(August).
  • Small, G. R. 1998. A Strategy for the Just Integration of Western and Customary Land Rights in Australia. Paper read at Pacific Rim Real Estate Conference, January 1998, at Perth, Western Australia.
  • Small, G.R., J. Oluwoye, Tim Havard, and Wang Hong. 1996. Distribution of Planning Betterment. Paper read at American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association International Conference, at Orlando, Florida.
  • Smith, Adam. 1975 (1776). An Enquiry into the Wealth of Nations. Dutton N.Y.: Everyman.
  • Wilson, C, and Keers. 1993. Introduction to Financial Management in Australia. 2 revised ed. Sydney: Prentice Hall.
  • Young, John. 1997. The Natural Economy.