Bundling and splitting: workspace tenure in two vectors

Author/s: Ann Godfrey

Date Published: 02/01/2020

Published in: Volume 26 - 2020 Issue 1 (pages 57 - 68)

Abstract

The Bundling and Splitting Matrix is a conceptual framework of real property tenure. It is used here to derive hypotheses as to the effects of two principal-agent problems: adverse selection and moral hazard on commercial office workspace energy performance under differing tenure types. The purpose of testing these hypotheses, in future research, is to inform disclosure policy. Disclosure here refers to the sharing of information between commercial office workspace lessors and lessees. In demonstrating this framework’s use, this paper’s contribution is methodological. Mitigating adverse selection is the objective of international ex-ante disclosure programs but past research has not isolated ex-ante disclosure’s effect in that mitigation from its other effects. The use of this framework also extends the method used by research measuring energy performance under different contract types. By putting tenure type, rather than a single contract as the object of inquiry, it sets out single or multiple possibly additive or counter-veiling principal-agent problems, adverse selection and moral hazard, each with its disclosure remedy. It is argued that doing so is increasingly significant with the growth in information age forms of workspace tenure such as coworking.

Download Full Article

Download the Full Article PDF

14445921.2019.1710078.pdf 14445921.2019.1710078.pdf (1014kB)

Keywords

Commercial Offices - Coworking - Disclosure - Energy Efficiency - Principal-Agent Theory

References

  • Acil Allen. (2015) Commercial building disclosure review, A report to the Department of Industry and Science. Retrieved from (2015).Retrieved from http://www.cbd.gov.au/files/CBD%20program%20review%20final%20report.pdfA report to the Department of Industry and Science.
  • Adams, W. J.Yellen, J. L. (1976) Commodity bundling and the burden of monopoly, The quarterly journal of economics. p:475-498. The quarterly journal of economics.
  • Akerlof, G. A. (1970) The market for ”lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism, The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 84, –.p:488-500. The Quarterly Journal of Economics.
  • Allcott, H.Greenstone, M. (2012) Is there an energy efficiency gap?, Journal of Economic Perspectives. 26(1), p:3-28. Journal of Economic Perspectives.
  • Antoniades, H.Halvitigala, D.Eves, C. (2018) CoWorking space v. The traditional office space: Challenges and opportunities in Sydney. (2018) No. Eres 2018_294. European Real Estate Society (ERES). CoWorking space v. The traditional office space: Challenges and opportunities in Sydney. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2018_294.html
  • Bates, B. (1988) Information as an economic good: Sources of individual and social capital, The Political Economy of Information. (1988). , 76–94.The Political Economy of Information.
  • Bouncken, R. B.Reuschl, A. J. (2018) Coworking-spaces: How a phenomenon of the sharing economy builds a novel trend for the workplace and for entrepreneurship, Review of Managerial Science. 12(1), p:317-334. Review of Managerial Science.
  • Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers (CIBSE). (2004) Energy efficiency in buildings, Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers. (2nd ed.). In. London, UK: Author. Retrieved fromChartered Institution of Building Services Engineers. Retrieved from https://www.worldcat.org/title/energy-efficiency-in-buildings-cibse-guide-f/oclc/56477559
  • Das, P.Wiley, J. A. (2014) Determinants of premia for energy-efficient design in the office market, Journal of Property Research. 31(1), p:64-86. Journal of Property Research.
  • Donaldson, L. (1990) The ethereal hand: Organizational economics and management theory, Academy of Management Review. 15(3), –.p:369-381. Academy of Management Review.
  • Economidou, M. (2014) Overcoming the split incentive barrier in the building sector, Workshop summary. Luxembourg: InPublications Office of the European Union. Workshop summary.
  • Eichholtz, P.Kok, N.Quigley, J. M. (2010) Doing well by doing good? Green office buildings, The American Economic Review. 100(5), p:2492-2509. The American Economic Review.
  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) Agency theory: An assessment and review, Academy of Management Review. 14(1),.Academy of Management Review.
  • Fudenberg, D.Tirole, J. (1990) Moral hazard and renegotiation in agency contracts, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society. 58, p:1279-1319. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society.
  • Fuerst, F.Gabrieli, T.McAllister, P. (2017) A green winner’s curse? Investor behavior in the market for eco-certified office buildings, Economic Modelling. 61, p:137-146. Economic Modelling.
  • Fuerst, F.Van de Wetering, J.Wyatt, P. (2013) Is intrinsic energy efficiency reflected in the pricing of office leases?, Building Research & Information. 41(4), p:373-383. Building Research & Information.
  • Gabe, J.Rehm, M. (2014) Do lessees pay energy efficiency rent premiums?, Journal of Property Investment & Finance. 32(4), p:333-351. Journal of Property Investment & Finance.
  • Gandhi, P.Brager, G. S. (2016) Commercial office plug load energy consumption trends and the role of occupant behavior, Energy and Buildings. 125, p:1-8. Energy and Buildings.
  • Godfrey, A. (2016) Work-architecture: A new space for real estate, 22nd Annual Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference. ,.
  • Hart, O. (1995) Firms, contracts, and financial structure.Clarendon press. Firms, contracts, and financial structure.
  • Hölmstrom, B. (1979) Moral hazard and observability, The Bell Journal of Economics. 10, –.p:74-91. The Bell Journal of Economics.
  • Hong, T.Piette, M. A.Chen, Y.Lee, S. HTaylor-Lange, S. CZhang, RPrice, P. (2015) Commercial building energy saver: An energy retrofit analysis toolkit, Applied Energy. 159, p:298-309. Applied Energy.
  • Hsu, D. (2014) How much information disclosure of building energy performance is necessary?, Energy Policy. 64, , –.p:263-272. Energy Policy.
  • Jessoe, K.Papineau, M.Rapson, D. (2019) Utilities included: Split incentives in commercial electricity contracts. (2019) Utilities included: Split incentives in commercial electricity contracts.
  • Jin, G. Z.Luca, M.Martin, D. (2015) Is no news (perceived as) bad news? An experimental investigation of information disclosure. (2015) (No. w21099). National Bureau of Economic Research. Is no news (perceived as) bad news? An experimental investigation of information disclosure.
  • Kahn, M. E.Kok, N. (2014) The capitalisation of green labels in the California housing market, Regional Science and Urban Economics. 47, p:25-34. Regional Science and Urban Economics.
  • Kim, Y. S.Srebric, J. (2017) Impact of occupancy rates on the building electricity consumption in commercial buildings, Energy and Buildings. 138, p:591-600. Energy and Buildings.
  • Lawrence Berkeley. (2017) Lawrence Berkeley Laboratories. (4-May-2017).Energy Efficiency Retrieved from. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratories. Retrieved from https://eta.lbl.gov/research-development/buildings-energy-efficiency
  • Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A.Isaac, H. (2016) The new office: How coworking changes the work concept, Journal of Business Strategy. 37(6), p:3-9. Journal of Business Strategy.
  • Lévai, A. (2018) A correlation analysis of amenities and price from coworking offices in Europe, Journal of Applied Economics and Business. 6,.p:41. Journal of Applied Economics and Business.
  • Merriam Webster Dictionary. (2017).Retrieved from. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary
  • Miller, N.Spivey, J.Florance, A. (2008) Does green pay off?, Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management. 14(4), p:385-400. Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management.
  • Molho, I. (1997) The economics of information: Lying and cheating in markets and organisations. Oxford, England/ Malden,MA:p:262. Blackwell. The economics of information: Lying and cheating in markets and organisations.
  • NABERS. (2017) National Australian built environment rating system. (20-June-2017).Retrieved from. National Australian built environment rating system. Retrieved from https://www.nabers.gov.au/ratings/estimate-your-rating
  • NABERS. (2019) National Australian built environment rating system. (10-January-2019).Retrieved from. National Australian built environment rating system. Retrieved from https://nabers.gov.au/public/webpages/home.aspx
  • Oyedokun, T. B. (2017) Green premium as a driver of green-labelled commercial buildings in the developing countries: Lessons from the UK and US, International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment. 6(2), –.p:723-733. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment.
  • PCA. (2015) Property Council of Australia, Phone call inquiry. June 1 2015. (2015).
  • Sackville, R.Neave, M. A.Edgeworth, B.Rossiter, C. J.Stone, M. A. (2008) Property law: Cases and materials. LexisNexis Butterworths. Property law: Cases and materials.
  • Sarfraz, O.Bach, C. K. (2018) Update to office equipment diversity and load factors (ASHRAE 1742-RP), Science and Technology for the Built Environment. 24(3), p:259-269. Science and Technology for the Built Environment.
  • Spinuzzi, C. (2012) Working alone together: Coworking as emergent collaborative activity, Journal of Business and Technical Communication. 26(4), –.p:399-441. Journal of Business and Technical Communication.
  • Stiglitz, J. E. (1975) The theory of “screening,” education, and the distribution of income, The American Economic Review. 65(3), –.p:283-300. The American Economic Review.
  • Szumilo, N.Fuerst, F. (2014) The operating expense puzzle of US green office buildings, Journal of Sustainable Real Estate. 5(1), p:86-110. Journal of Sustainable Real Estate.
  • Weijs-Perrée, M.Appel-Meulenbroek, R.de Vries, B.Romme, G. (2016) Networking behavior and knowledge sharing in business centers, European Conference on Knowledge Management. p:966. Academic Conferences International Limited, Kidmore End.
  • Whitson., B. A. (2011).Model Green Lease Retrieved from. Retrieved from https://modelgreenlease.wordpress.com/The
  • Wright, P. M.Dunford, B.Snell, S. (2001) Human resources and the resource-based view of the firm, Journal of Management. 27(6), p:701-721. Journal of Management.