Home • PRRES Inc. Journal • Read the Journal

Modelling the effects of affordable housing ‘sticks’ and ‘carrots’ for developer-delivered projects

Author/s: Georgia Warren-Myers, Erryn McRae, Katrina Raynor, Matthew Palm

Date Published: 2/09/2019

Published in: Volume 25 - 2019 Issue 3 (pages 195 - 215)

Abstract

The literature suggests both “Stick” and “Carrot” initiatives can encourage property developers to include Affordable Housing in their developments. Such initiatives include affordable housing contributions or requirements (the stick) and land cost subsidies, density bonuses, access to low-interest finance, reduced planning timeframes and reduced car parking requirements (the carrots). Despite their widespread application internationally, Australian developers and policymakers have resisted affordable housing incentive structures. Recent legislation in Victoria empowers local planners to approve affordable housing contributions and incentives on acase-by-case basis. This paper provides aquantitative study investigating the feasibility of introducing housing affordability contributions and incentives when developers enter the planning process. This paper demonstrates aone-size fits all approach to affordable housing contributions and incentives may not be appropriate, modelled through scenario analysis of three different sized case studies. Optimum scenarios identified a balance of carrots and sticks. However, project characteristics determined the applicability and effectiveness of an incentive for aproject. Therefore, asingular approach may not be appropriate for all projects in amunicipality or state; and alayered and flexible approach for “Sticks” and “Carrots” should be considered to maximise the social benefit of these incentives and ensure developers financial viability.

Download Full Article

Download the Full Article PDF

14445921.2019.1693322.pdf 14445921.2019.1693322.pdf (2MB)

Keywords

Affordable Housing - Affordable Housing Contributions - Affordable Housing Policy - Density Bonuses - Development Feasibility - Incentives

References

  • Anderson-Oliver, M. (2014) Opportunistic, ill-considered and impossibly vague: Barriers to inclusionary zoning in Victoria. Melbourne:Architecture, Building and Planning University of Melbourne. Opportunistic, ill-considered and impossibly vague: Barriers to inclusionary zoning in Victoria.
  • ArgusEstate Master. (2019) Estate master [computer software]. Sydney:Altus Group. Estate master [computer software].
  • Atherton, E.French, N.Gabrielli, L. (2008) Decision theory and real estate development: A note on uncertainty, Journal of European Real Estate Research. 1(2), p:162-182. Journal of European Real Estate Research.
  • Austin, P. M.Gurran, N.Whitehead, C. M. (2014) Planning and affordable housing in Australia, New Zealand and England: Common culture
    • different mechanisms, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment. 29(3), p:455-472. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment.
    Australian Property Institute. (2007) Valuation principles and practice. (2nd ed.). Deakin, Canberra: ( ed.)Author. Valuation principles and practice.
    Australian Property Institute. (2012) Valuation and property standards, (2012).Retrieved from. Australian Property Institute. Retrieved from http://anzvps.api.org.au/11-5-anzrpgn.php
    Beer, A.Kearins, B.Pieters, H. (2007) Housing affordability and planning in Australia: The challenge of policy under neo-liberalism, Housing Studies. 22(1), p:11-24. Housing Studies.
    Biggar, J. (2017) Between public goals and private projects: Negotiating community benefits for density from toronto’s urban redevelopment.Department of Geography (Doctoral dissertation). University of Toronto. Between public goals and private projects: Negotiating community benefits for density from toronto’s urban redevelopment.
    Bouchard, M. J. (2012) Social innovation, an analytical grid for understanding the social economy: The example of the Québec housing sector, Service Business. 6(1), –.p:47-59. Service Business.
    Breen, K. (2014) International approaches to facilitating affordable housing outcomes and their application to Victoria, Australia. Australia.Report October. AV Jennings Churchill Fellowship. International approaches to facilitating affordable housing outcomes and their application to Victoria, Australia.
    Carey, A. (2016) Five storeys, zero car parks: VCAT gives green light to contentious building, The Age.Retrieved from. Retrieved from https://www.theage.com.au
    Crook, T.Henneberry, J.Whitehead, C. (2016) Planning gain: Providing infrastructure and affordable housing. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons. Planning gain: Providing infrastructure and affordable housing.
    DELWP. (2018). (Planning mechanisms for affordable housing). Retrieved from https://www.planning.vic.gov.au/policy-and-strategy/affordable-housing
    Dodson, J. (2006) The “roll” of the state: Government, neoliberalism and housing assistance in four advanced economies, Housing, Theory and Society. 23(4), –.p:224-243. Housing, Theory and Society.
    Estate Master. (2019) Estate master development feasibility. Australia:Argus Estate Master. Estate master development feasibility.
    Freeman, L.Schuetz, J. (2016) Producing affordable housing in rising markets: What works?, Cityscape. 19(1), p:217-236. Cityscape.
    Golland, A. (2010). Retrieved from.South bucks development economics study update, three dragons. Retrieved from http://www.southbucks.gov.uk/environment/planning/local_plan/908.asp
    Greater London Authority. (2017) What is homes for londoners?,.Retrieved from. Retrieved from https://www.london.gov.uk/what-we-do/housing-and-land/homes-londoners/what-homes-londoners
    Gurran, N.Gilbert, C.Gibb, K.van Den Nouwelant, R.James, A.Phibbs, P. (2018) Supporting affordable housing supply: Inclusionary planning in new and renewing, (2018)
    Gurran, N.Ruming, K. (2015) Less planning, more development? Housing and urban reform discourses in Australia, Journal of Economic Policy Reform. 19(3), p:1-19. Journal of Economic Policy Reform.
    Gurran, N.Ruming, K.Randolf., B.Quintal, D. (2008) Planning, government charges, and the costs of land and housing (positioning paper). Melbourne: AHURI. Planning, government charges, and the costs of land and housing (positioning paper).
    Havard, T. (2008) Contemporary property development, London, UK:RIBA Publishing.
    Havard, T. (2014) Financial feasibility studies for property development: Theory and practice. London:Routledge. Financial feasibility studies for property development: Theory and practice.
    Hayward, D. (1996) The reluctant landlords? A history of public housing in Australia, Urban Policy and Research. 14(1),.p:5. Urban Policy and Research.
    Henneberry, J. (2016) Development viability, Planning gain: Providing infrastructure and affordable housing. Chister, UK: In (Eds.), (pp. –)p:115-139. John Wiley & Sons. Planning gain: Providing infrastructure and affordable housing.
    Hodyl, L. (2015) To investigate planning policies that deliver positive social outcomes in hyper-dense, high-rise residential environments. Australia: (2015). ,.(Report February 2015). Winston Churchill Fellowship 2014.
    Hutchison, N.Disberry, A. (2015) Market forces or institutional factors: What hinders housing development on brownfield land?, Journal of European Real Estate Research. 8(3), p:285-304. Journal of European Real Estate Research.
    Kendall, R.Tulip, P. (2018) The effect of zoning on housing prices, (Research Discussion Paper March). Canberra, Australia: (2018) Reserve Bank of Australia.
    Kleit, R. G.Page, S. B. (2015) The changing role of public housing authorities in the affordable housing delivery system, Housing Studies. 30(4), p:621-644. Housing Studies.
    Langdon, D. (2009) Infrastructure charges and new house affordability: The cost of development in Australia’s growth centres. Sydney, Australia:(Prepared for the Residential Development Council). Davis Langdon. Infrastructure charges and new house affordability: The cost of development in Australia’s growth centres.
    Murphy, L. (2016) The politics of land supply and affordable housing: Auckland’s housing accord and special housing areas, Urban Studies. 53(12), –.p:2530-2547. Urban Studies.
    Palm, M.Niemeier, D. (2017) Does placing affordable housing near rail raise development costs? Evidence from California’s four largest metropolitan planning organizations, Housing Policy Debate. 28(2), p:1-19. Housing Policy Debate.
    Productivity Commission. (2017) (Report on government services 2017, volume G), Housing and Homelessness. Canberra, Australia: (2017)uthor.
    Property Council of Australia. (2009) Inquiry into the impact of the state government decision to change the urban growth boundary. Melbourne, Australia:(Submission to the Outer Suburban/Interface Service and Development Parliamentary Committee October 2009). Author. Inquiry into the impact of the state government decision to change the urban growth boundary.
    Property Council of Australia. (2016) GSC’s much needed housing supply targets face ‘inclusionary zoning’ risk,.Retrieved from. Retrieved from https://www.propertycouncil.com.au/Web/Content/Media_Release/NSW/2016/GSC_s_much_needed_housing_supply_targets_face__inclusionary_zoning__risk.aspx
    Rawlinsons. (2017) Construction cost consultants and quantity surveyors 2017. Rawlinsons Australian construction handbook. (35th ed.). Perth, Western Australia: ( ed.Rawlhouse Publishing. Construction cost consultants and quantity surveyors 2017. Rawlinsons Australian construction handbook.
    Raynor, K. (2017) Delivering affordable housing in Melbourne: Actions, opportunities and implementation. Melbourne:(Housing Summit background paper). Transforming Housing, Melbourne School of Design Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning. The University of Melbourne. Delivering affordable housing in Melbourne: Actions, opportunities and implementation.
    Reed, R.Sims, S. (2015) Property development. Oxon, UK: Routledge. Property development.
    Rolnik, R. (2013) Late neoliberalism: The financialization of homeownership and housing rights, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 37(3), –.p:1058-1066. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research.
    Rowley, S.Phibbs, P. (2016) The incidence and value of planning publications, Planning gain: Providing Infrastructure and affordable housing. Chichester, UK: p:115-139. John Wiley & Sons. Planning gain: Providing Infrastructure and affordable housing.
    Rowley, S.Costello, G.Higgins, D.Phibbs, P. (2014) The financing of residential development. Melbourne Australia: (2014) (AHURI Final Report No.219). Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute.
    Rowley, S.Crook, T. (2016) The incidence and value of planning obligations, Chichester: p:140-174. John Wiley & Sons.
    Rowley, S.Phibbs, P. (2012) Delivering diverse and affordable housing on infill development sites. Melbourne Australia: (2012) (AHURI Final Report No.193). Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute. Delivering diverse and affordable housing on infill development sites.
    Ryan, S.Enderle, B. E. (2012) Examining spatial patterns in affordable housing: The case of California density bonus implementation, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment. 27(4), p:413-425. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment.
    Schuetz, J.Meltzer, R.Been, V. (2010) Silver bullet or trojan horse? The effects of inclusionary zoning on local housing markets in the United States, Urban Studies. 48(2), p:297-329. Urban Studies.
    SGS Economics and Planning Pty Ltd. (2015) Revisiting the economics of inclusionary zoning. Melbourne: (April-2015)Report for SGS Economics and Planning. SGS Economics and Planning. Revisiting the economics of inclusionary zoning.
    Thaden, E.Wang, R. (2017) Inclusionary housing in the United States: Prevalence, impact, and practices, (Working Papers). Cambridge, MA: (2017) Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
    Tomlinson, R. (2012) Introduction: A housing lens on Australia’s unintended cities, Australia’s unintended cities. Melbourne: In (Ed.), (pp. 1–17)CSIRO Publishing. Australia’s unintended cities.
    Victoria State Government. (2017) Ministerial interventions for permit applications. Permits and applications,.Retrieved from. Retrieved from https://www.planning.vic.gov.au/planning-permit-applications/ministerial-permits/ministerial-interventions-in-permit-applications
    Victorian Government. (2017) Homes for victorians,.Retrieved from. Retrieved from http://www.premier.vic.gov.au/homes-for-victorians/
    Warren-Myers, P. M.Raynor, K. (2019b) The affordable housing calculator manual, Melbourne: (June-2019b) Retrieved from. Transforming Housing, Melbourne School of Design Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning. The University of Melbourne. Retrieved from https://msd.unimelb.edu.au/research/projects/current/transforming-housing/affordable-housing-tools/affordable-housing-calculator
    Warren-Myers, R. K.Palm, M. (2019a) An affordable housing negotiation calculator: Identifying feasible opportunities for voluntary agreements, forthcoming at the State of Australian Cities Conference, Perth, Western Australia, 3–5 December 2019.
    Wetzstein, S. (2017) The global urban housing affordability crisis, Urban Studies. 54(14), –.p:3159-3177. Urban Studies.
    Whitehead, C. (2016) The economics of development value and planning gain, Planning gain: Providing infrastructure and affordable housing. Chichester: In (Eds.), (pp. 20–34)John Wiley & Sons. Planning gain: Providing infrastructure and affordable housing.
    Wilkinson, S.Reed, R. (2008) Property development, (5th ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
    Yates, J.Yanotti, M. B. (2016) Australia’s 25 years with a deregulated housing finance system: Looking back and looking forward, Milestones in European housing finance. West Sussex, UK: p:37-53. John Wiley and Sons. Milestones in European housing finance.
    Yin, R. K. (2014) Case study research design and methods. (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: ( ed.Sage. Case study research design and methods.
    );