Home • PRRES Inc. Journal • Read the Journal

The economic value of the Colombo Public Library, Sri Lanka: contingent valuation approach

Author/s: Prathap Chandima Kaluthanthri, Janakie Edirisinghe

Date Published: 3/05/2016

Published in: Volume 22 - 2016 Issue 2 (pages 115 - 126)

Abstract

Net Revenue of a public library is not an indicator of the true value of services rendered by a public library to the wider society. The peoples’ perception of the service of the library or economic value is the true value of the library. The Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) used to assess the economic value of a public library which is not a service in the free market economy. This study employs CVM: a branch of the Stated Preference Method to measure the economic value of the Colombo Public Library (CPL) Sri Lanka. The payment vehicle is a Trust Fund. The logistic regression has been applied to estimate the Willingness to Pay (WTP) of citizens which elicited through single bound dichotomous choice question with onetime payment option. The WTP for the population is aggregated by using mean probabilistic logic WTP of the sample. The study found that annualized economic value of the CPL is higher than its total capital and recurrent expenditure per year. Thus, continuation of public funding is acceptable even CPL makes financial losses to the Colombo Municipal Council.

Download Full Article

Download the Full Article PDF

14445921.2016.1203231.pdf 14445921.2016.1203231.pdf (810kB)

Keywords

Contingent Valuation Method - Economic Value - Public Library

References

  • Aabø, S. (2005) Are public libraries worth their price? A contingent valuation study of Norwegian public libraries, New Library World. 106, –.p:487-495. New Library World.
  • Aabø, S.Audunson, R. (2002) Rational choice and valuation of public libraries can economic models for evaluating non-market goods be applied to public libraries?, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. 34, p:5-15. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science.
  • Alberini, A. (1995) Testing willingness-to-pay models of discrete choice contingent valuation survey data, Land Economics. 71, –.p:83-95. Land Economics.
  • Audunson, R. (2005) The public library as a meeting-place in a multicultural and digital context: The necessity of low-intensive meeting-places, Journal of Documentation. 61, –.p:429-441. Journal of Documentation.
  • Bateman, I. J.Carson, R. T.Day, B.Hanemann, M.Hanley, N.Hett, T.Özdemiroglu, E. (2002) Economic valuation with stated preference techniques: A manual. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Economic valuation with stated preference techniques: A manual.
  • Benhamou, F. (1996) Is increased public spending for the preservation of historic monuments inevitable? The French case, Journal of Cultural Economics. 20, –.p:115-131. Journal of Cultural Economics.
  • Cameron, T. A.James, M. D. (1987) Estimating willingness to pay from survey data: An alternative pre-test-market evaluation procedure, Journal of Marketing Research. 24, p:389-395. Journal of Marketing Research.
  • Canfora, L. (1990) The vanished library. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: 7, (Vol. )University of California Press. The vanished library.
  • CMC. (2011) Annual budget. Colombo:Author. Annual budget.
  • D’Elia, G. (1993) The roles of the public library in society: The results of a national survey, Final Report [and] Appendix. Evanston, IL.Urban Libraries Council.
  • Frey, B. S. (1997) Evaluating cultural property: The economic approach, International Journal of Cultural Property. 6, –.p:231-246. International Journal of Cultural Property.
  • Frey, B. S.Pommerehne, W. (1989) Muses and markets: Explorations in the economics of the arts. Oxford: Blackwell. Muses and markets: Explorations in the economics of the arts.
  • Hanemann, W. M. (1984) Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses, American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 66, –.p:332-341. American Journal of Agricultural Economics.
  • Harrison, M. (2010) Valuing the future: The social discount rate in cost-benefit analysis. Canberra: (Visiting Researcher Paper)Productivity Commission. Valuing the future: The social discount rate in cost-benefit analysis.
  • Hawkins, B. L. (1998) The unsustainability of the traditional library and the threat to higher education, The mirage of continuity: Reconfiguring academic information resources for the 21st century. Washington, DC: p:154-177. Council on Library and Information Resources. The mirage of continuity: Reconfiguring academic information resources for the 21st century.
  • Holt, G. E.Elliott, D.Moore, A. (1999) Placing a value on public library services, Public Libraries. 38, p:98-109. Public Libraries.
  • Horowitz, J. K.McConnell, K. E. (2002) A review of WTA/WTP studies, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 44, p:426-447. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
  • Jacobsen, J. B.Hanley, N. (2009) Are there income effects on global willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation?, Environmental and Resource Economics. 43, p:137-160. Environmental and Resource Economics.
  • Kmenta, J. (1971) Elements of Econometrics. (2nd ed. ed.)University of Michigan Press. Elements of Econometrics.
  • Kusummulla, S. (2011) Duhunan Denum Sapurana Kolaba Mahajana Pusthakalaya, Lankadeepa. (, July 29). , p.p:16. Lankadeepa.
  • Linley, R.Usherwood, B. (1998) New measures for the new library: A social audit of public libraries. London: British Library Board. New measures for the new library: A social audit of public libraries.
  • Martin, F. (1994) Determining the size of museum subsidies, Journal of Cultural Economics. 18, –.p:255-270. Journal of Cultural Economics.
  • Matarasso, F. (1998) Beyond book issues: the social potential of library projects. London Comedi :.Beyond book issues: the social potential of library projects.
  • Navrud, S.Ready, R. C. (2002) Valuing cultural heritage: Applying environmental valuation techniques to historic buildings, monuments and artifacts. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Valuing cultural heritage: Applying environmental valuation techniques to historic buildings, monuments and artifacts.
  • Oxford Dictionaries. (2011) Library. Retrieved fromLibrary. Retrieved from http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/library
  • Papandrea, F. (1999) Willingness to pay for domestic television programming, Journal of Cultural Economics. 23, –.p:147-164. Journal of Cultural Economics.
  • Pearce, D.Mourato, S.Navrud, S.Ready, R. C. (2002) 15. Review of existing studies, their policy use and future research needs, Valuing cultural heritage: Applying environmental valuation techniques to historic buildings, monuments and artifacts. Cheltenham: p:257-266. Edward Elgar Publishing. Valuing cultural heritage: Applying environmental valuation techniques to historic buildings, monuments and artifacts.
  • Roche, H. (1998) Teatro Colon. The willingness to pay for a mixed public good, Paper presented at the Unpublished paper delivered at ACEI Tenth International Conference. ,.
  • Samuelson, P. A. (1954) The pure theory of public expenditure, The Review of Economics and Statistics. 36, –.p:387-389. The Review of Economics and Statistics.
  • Throsby, C. D.Withers, G. A.Shanahan, J.Hendon, W.Hilhorst, I.van Straalen, J. (1983) Measuring the demand for the arts as a public good, Paper presented at the Economic support for the arts. [Volume 3, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Cultural Economics and Planning, May 26–28, 1982, Netherlands].
  • Tietenberg, T. H. (2006) Environmental and natural resource economicsAddison-Wesley Longman. Environmental and natural resource economics.
  • Weligamage, S. P. (2011) An economic analysis of intersectoral water allocation in southeastern Sri Lanka. Washington, DC:Washington State University. An economic analysis of intersectoral water allocation in southeastern Sri Lanka.
  • Zhuang, J.Liang, Z.Lin, T.De Guzman, F. (2007) Theory and practice in the choice of social discount rate for cost-benefit analysis: A survey. Philippines: Asian Development Bank. Theory and practice in the choice of social discount rate for cost-benefit analysis: A survey.