What gives to keep that price point? High-density residential developments
Author/s: David Higgins, Trivess Moore
Date Published: 2/01/2015
Published in: Volume 21 - 2015 Issue 1 (pages 37 - 49)
Abstract
High-density living is now widely accepted in the built environment. At the apartment entry price-point, space and place appear to be the key considerations, with limited attention to a building’s social, physical and environmental features. To examine this, the researchers interviewed leading Melbourne property developers and consultants to identify the challenges of incorporating innovation relative to governance, design, and construction and building operations into the competitive high-density property development market. Responses demonstrate that post-occupancy analysis can be a tool to better inform property stakeholders. When presented to prospective purchasers, this information could shift the key consideration from an entry price point to the features of a well-designed apartment and so redirect the current ‘minimalist’ approach adopted by some new property development entrants to improving occupier living experience and ongoing maintenance costs.Download Full Article
Download the Full Article PDF14445921.2015.1026133.pdf (309kB) |
Keywords
Building Performance Evaluation - Environmental Indicator - High-Density Residential Developments - Mixed Tenure - Modular Construction - Post Occupancy Analysis - Stakeholder DialogueReferences
- Brown, Z.Cole, R. (2009) Influence of occupants’ knowledge on comfort expectations and behaviour, Building Research and Information. 37, p:227-245. Building Research and Information.
- Charter Keck Cramer. (2013) The strategic role of the Melbourne apartment market in the city’s future housing structure. Melbourne:Charter Keck Cramer. The strategic role of the Melbourne apartment market in the city’s future housing structure.
- City of Melbourne. (2013a) Future living: A discussion paper identifying issues and options for housing our community. Melbourne:City of Melbourne. Future living: A discussion paper identifying issues and options for housing our community.
- City of Melbourne. (2013b) Understanding the quality of housing design. Melbourne:City of Melbourne. Understanding the quality of housing design.
- Douglas, J. (1993) Development in appraising the total performance of buildings, Structural Survey. 12, –.p:10-15. Structural Survey.
- Iyer-Raniga, U.Moore, T.Wasiluk, K. (2014) Residential building sustainability rating tools in Australia, Environment Design Guide. p:1-14. Environment Design Guide.
- Jailani, J.Reed, R.Warren-Myers, G. (2013) Form versus Function: A post-evaluation analysis of the implementation of sustainability in commercial building. Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference. Form versus Function: A post-evaluation analysis of the implementation of sustainability in commercial building.
- JLL. (2007) Sustainability: Bridging the knowledge gap. Sydney:Jones Lang LaSalle. Sustainability: Bridging the knowledge gap.
- LHA. (2012) Liveable housing design guidelines. (2nd ed. ed.). Sydney: Liveable Housing Australia. Liveable housing design guidelines.
- NSW Government. (2011) State environmental planning policy no 65—design quality of residential flat development. Sydney:Author. State environmental planning policy no 65—design quality of residential flat development.
- Randolph, B.Tice, A. (2013) Who lives in higher density housing? A study of spatially discontinuous housing sub-markets in Sydney and Melbourne, Urban Studies. 50, p:2661-2681. Urban Studies.
- Soebato, V.Williamson, T. (2001) Multi-criteria assessment of building performance: Theory and implementation, Building and Environment. 36, p:681-690. Building and Environment.
- Willig, C. (2008) Introducing qualitative research in psychology. (2nd ed. ed.). London.Open University Press. Introducing qualitative research in psychology.
- Yin, R. (2009) Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage. Case study research: Design and methods.