Home • PRRES Inc. Journal • Read the Journal

The Role of Institutions in Sustaining Mandatory Low-Income Housing

Author/s: Hasniyati Hamzah, Laurence Murphy

Date Published: 1/01/2014

Published in: Volume 20 - 2014 Issue 2 (pages 129 - 144)

Abstract

State intervention is crucial in delivering adequate housing for the urban poor. In 1982, the Malaysian government introduced a policy mandating low-income housing of prescribed building standards within new developments. Basically, private developers are required to have a certain proportion of low-cost housing in new developments above a certain size. The “low-cost housing quota” (LCHQ) policy has delivered almost 600,000 low-cost houses. Although the literature has described housing regulations as costly and inefficient, little is known of how Malaysia’s LCHQ requirement has continued to successfully produce low-income housing. Employing an institutional approach, this study provides a meso-level analysis of LCHQ in an understudied state in Malaysia. Findings show that planners adopt a semi-flexible stance in interpreting housing regulations, whereas developers assume strategic compliance behaviour. Furthermore, the study indicates that the mandatory low-cost housing has been sustained due to the reconciliation of actors’ motivations, negotiations between actors and reasonable regulatory mediations. By focusing on the behaviours of the two main actors in low-cost housing provision, this paper contributes to an understanding of on the ground operation of the LCHQ and, thus, informs policymakers on improvements to the existing system.

Download Full Article

Download the Full Article PDF

14445921.2014.11104391.pdf 14445921.2014.11104391.pdf (409kB)

Keywords

Behavioural Analysis - Institutions - Low-Cost Housing - Mandatory Requirement

References

  • Abdullah, F H 1997, ‘Affirmative action policy in Malaysia: To restructure society, to eradicate poverty’, Ethnic Studies Report, Vol. XV, pp. 189-221.
  • Adams, D 2008, ‘Mapping out the regulatory environment and its interaction with land and property markets’, Energy Policy, Vol. 36, pp. 4570-4574.
  • Adams, D, Watkins, C and White, M 2005a, ‘Conceptualising state-market relations in land and property: The growth of institutionalism - extension or challenge to mainstream economics?’, in Adams, D, Watkins, C and White, M (eds.) Planning, public policy and property markets, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
  • Adams, D, Watkins, C and White, M 2005b, ‘Planning, public policy and property markets: Current relations and future challenges’, in Adams, D, Watkins, C and White, M (eds.) Planning, public policy & property markets, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
  • Agus, MR 2002, ‘The role of state and market in the Malaysian housing sector’, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, Vol. 17, pp. 49-67.
  • Agus, MR, Doling, J and Lee, D S 2002, ‘Asian housing policy: Similarities and differences’, in Agus, MR, Doling, J and Lee, D S (eds.) Housing policy systems in South and East Asia, Macmillan Publishers Ltd, Basingstoke, Hampshire.
  • Aluko, O 2011, ‘Sustainable housing development and functionality of planning laws in Nigeria: the case of cosmopolitan Lagos’, Journal of Sustainable Development, Vol. 4, pp. 139-150.
  • Aluko, O 2012, ‘The effects of Land Use Act on sustainable housing provision in Nigeria: The Lagos State experience’, Journal of Sustainable Development, Vol. 5, pp. 114-122.
  • Arku, G and Harris, R 2005, ‘Housing as a tool of economic development since 1929’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 29, pp. 895-915.
  • Awuah, KGB and Hammond, FN 2014, ‘Determinants of low land use planning regulation compliance rate in Ghana’, Habitat International, Vol. 41.
  • Ball, M 1998, ‘Institutions in British property research: A review’, Urban Studies, Vol. 35, pp. 1501-1517.
  • Ball, M 2003, ‘Markets and the structure of the housebuilding industry: An international perspective’, Urban Studies, Vol. 40, pp. 897-916.
  • Ball, M 2010, ‘Planning delay and the responsiveness of English housing supply’, Urban Studies, Vol. 48, No, 2, pp. 349-362.
  • Bertaud, A and Brueckner, KK 2004, Analysing building height restrictions: Predicted impacts, welfare costs, and a case study of Bangalore, India, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3290, World Bank.
  • Bertaud, A and Malpezzi, S 2001, ‘Measuring the costs and benefits of urban land use regulations: A simple model with an application to Malaysia’, Journal of Housing Economics, Vol. 10, pp. 393-418.
  • Burgess, G and Monk, SWC, 2011, ‘Delivering local infrastructure and affordable housing through the planning system: The future of planning obligations through Section 106’, People, Place & Policy Online, Vol. 5, pp. 1-11.
  • Campbell, H and Marshall, R 2000, ‘Moral obligations, planning, and the public interest: A commentary on current British practice’, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol. 27, pp. 297-312.
  • Chan, NW and Parker, DJ 1996, ‘Response to dynamic flood hazard factors in Peninsular Malaysia’, The Geographical Journal, Vol. 162, pp. 313-325.
  • Coiacetto, E 2001, ‘Diversity in real estate developer behaviour: A case for research’, Urban Policy and Research, Vol. 19, pp. 43-59.
  • Crook, ADH, Monk, S, Rowley, S and Whitehead, CME 2006, ‘Planning gain and the supply of new affordable housing in England’, Town Planning Review, Vol. 77, pp. 353-373.
  • Cullingworth, B and Nadin, V 2006, Town and country planning in the UK, Routledge, Oxford.
  • Dowall, DE amnd Clarke, G 1996, A framework for reforming urban development policies in developing countries in Urban Management Programme, World Bank.
  • Dubben, N and Williams, B 2009, Partnerships in urban property development, Wiley-Blackwell,West Sussex.
  • Evans, AW 2009, Paradoxes in the provision of affordable housing in Britain, 15th Annual Conference of the Pacific Rim Real Estate Society, Sydney.
  • Goh, CS and Lee, KT 2010, ‘A visionary and conceptual macroalgae-based third-generation bioethanol (TGB) biorefinery in Sabah, Malaysia as an underlay for renewable and sustainable development’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 14, pp. 842-848.
  • Hannah, L, Bertaud, A, Malpezzi, S and Mayo, S 1989, Malaysia: The housing sector; getting the incentives right, in World Bank Sector Report 7292-MA.
  • Hezri, AA and Hasan, MN 2004, ‘Management framework for sustainable development indicators in the State of Selangor, Malaysia’, Ecological Indicators, Vol. 4, pp. 287-304.
  • Hezri, AA and Hasan, MN 2006, ‘Towards sustainable development? The evolution of environmental policy in Malaysia’, Natural Resources Forum, Vol. 30, pp. 37-50.
  • Hodgson, GM 1998, ‘The approach of institutional economics’, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 36, pp. 166-192.
  • Hodgson, GM 2000, ‘What is the essence of institutional economics?’, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 34, pp. 317.
  • Hodgson, GM 2006, ‘What are institutions?’, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. XL, pp. 1-25.
  • Keivani, R and Werna, E 2001, ‘Modes of housing provision in developing countries’, Progress in Planning, Vol. 55, pp. 65-118.
  • Kumar, K 1989, Conducting key informant interviews in developing countries, Agency for International Development.
  • Malaysia 1966-2010, Various Malaysia Plans, Government of Malaysia.
  • Malpezzi, S and Mayo, SK 1997, ‘Getting housing incentives right: A case study of the effects of regulation, taxes and subsidies on housing supply in Malaysia’, Land Economics, Vol. 73, pp. 372-391.
  • Mayo, S and Sheppard, S 2001, ‘Housing supply and the effects of stochastic development control’, Journal of Housing Economics, Vol. 10, pp. 109-128.
  • Mhlg. 2009. e-Home Portal [Online]. Kuala Lumpur. Available: http://ehome.kpkt.gov.my/ehome/ehomebi/profil/pakr.cfm[Accessed 7.4.2009 2009].
  • Mhlg, 2011, National Housing Policy, Department NH, Putrajaya, Malaysia.
  • Mohamed, AR and Lee, KT 2006, ‘Energy Policy’, Energy for sustainable development in Malaysia: Energy policy and alternative energy, Vol. 34, pp. 2388-2397.
  • Monk, S, Short, C and Whitehead, C 2005, ‘Planning obligations and affordable housing’, in Adams, D, Watkins, C and White, M (Eds) Planning, public policy & property markets, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
  • Monk, S & Whitehead, CME 1999, ‘Evaluating the economic impact of planning controls in the United Kingdom: Some implications for housing’, Land Economics, Vol. 75, pp. 74-93.
  • Monkkonen, P 2013, ‘Urban land-use regulations and housing markets in developing countries: Evidence from Indonesia on the importance of enforcement’, Land Use Policy, Vol. 34, pp. 255-264.
  • Richards, L 2005, Handling qualitative data: A practical guide, Sage Publications Ltd, London.
  • Satsangi, M and Dunmore, K 2003, ‘The planning system and the provision of affordable housing in rural Britain: A comparison of the Scottish and English experience’, Housing Studies, Vol. 18, pp. 201-217. State Authority of Terengganu 2006, Rancangan Struktur Negeri Terengganu 2020, Terengganu State Authority, Terengganu, Malaysia.
  • State Economic Planning Unit 2009, Basic data for the State of Terengganu.
  • Tiesdell, S and Allmendinger, P 2005, ‘Planning tools and markets: Towards an extended conceptualisation’ in Adams, D, Watkins, C and White, M (Eds) Planning, public policy & property markets, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
  • Un-Habitat 2003. The challenge of slums: Global report on human settlements 2003, Earthscan Publications Ltd, Oxford.
  • Un-Habitat 2011, Affordable land and housing in Asia, UN-Habitat, Nairobi.
  • Wan Abd Aziz, WNA, Hanif, NR and Ahmad, F 2008, ‘The state intervention in achieving a quality urban living standard’, International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, Vol. 1 , pp. 337-351.
  • White, M and Allmendinger, P 2003, ‘Land-use planning and the housing market: A comparative review of the UK and the USA’, Urban Studies, Vol. 40, pp. 953-972.
  • Whitehead, C 2007, ‘Planning policies and affordable housing: England as a successful case study?’, Housing Studies, Vol. 22, pp. 25-44.
  • Whitehead, C, Chiu, RLH, Tsenkova, S and Turner, B 2010, ‘Land use regulation: Transferring lessons from developed economies’, in Lall, SV, Friere, M, Yuen, B, Rajack, R and Helluin, J (Eds) Urban land markets, World Bank, Washington.
  • Whitehead, C and Monk, S 2011, ‘Affordable home ownership after the crisis: England as a demonstration project’, International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, Vol. 4, pp. 326-340.