Home • PRRES Inc. Journal • Read the Journal

Assessing Compensation for Landholders Affected by Coal Seam Gas Occupation

Author/s: Michael Fibbens, Michael Y Mak, Anthony Williams

Date Published: 1/01/2014

Published in: Volume 20 - 2014 Issue 2 (pages 161 - 170)

Abstract

Valuation theory in Australia has long established principles relating to compensation for the acquisition of part of property. However, the theory relating to assessing compensation for coal seam gas (CSG) occupation is relatively undeveloped and CSG activity in New South Wales (NSW) takes place in an environment where some confusion surrounds the subject of the assessment of landholder compensation. This paper applies a comparative study of the compensation assessment practices of courts in NSW, Queensland and Alberta. The research, reported in this paper, documents a trail of judicial decisions supporting the use of “piecemeal” and “before and after” approaches where mining infrastructure occupies part of property. A comparison of the valuation techniques identified in this study with the harms described by Fibbens et al 2013 indicates the “piecemeal” and “before and after” valuation approaches have greater utility in addressing losses to the balance land than the so called common industry practices used in NSW which ignore effects on the balance land.

Download Full Article

Download the Full Article PDF

14445921.2014.11104393.pdf 14445921.2014.11104393.pdf (487kB)

Keywords

Before and After - Coal Seam Gas (Csg) - Compensation - Piecemeal - Valuation Methods

References

  • , 2009. NSW Mining Warden.Alcorn & Ors v Coal Mines of Australia Pty Ltd
  • Mining Warden.Australian Gaslight Company v O’Grady & Burrell, 1986. NSW
  • Australian Senate 2011, Response to questions taken on notice APPEA, 20 July 2011, 1.
  • Barton B 1998, “Principles for the fixing of compensation: Some current surface rights issues’, in Views on Surface Rights In Alberta, Canadian Institute of Resources Law, Alberta.
  • , October 1967, Vol. 19 No. 8, pp. 719-721.Brancatisano & Anor v The Minister 1967, The Valuer
  • . Canadian Natural Resources Limited v Babb and Ors. SRB 2013, 12
  • Cresswell, J and Plano Clark, V 2007, Designing and conducting mixed methods research, Sage, California.
  • . Electricity Commission of NSWv Reynolds 1978, 1
  • Fibbens, M, Mak, M and Williams, A 2013, Coal seam gas extraction: does the compensation match the mischief?, 19 Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference, January 2013. Melbourne.
  • Fibbens, M and Mak, M 2013, Coal seam gas and emerging issues for valuers, Australia and New Zealand Property Journal, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp.173-178.
  • Fibbens, M, Mak, MY and Williams, A 2014, Compensation for coal seam gas occupation: Assessing the harms, 20 Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference, 19-22 January 2014, Lincoln University, Christchurch, New Zealand.
  • Flick U, 2009, An introduction to qualitative research, Sage, California.
  • , NSW Mining Warden.Halfpenny Investments Pty Ltd v Sydney Gas Operations, 2003
  • Herps, M 1969, Compensation for easements, Fifth Pan-Pacific Congress of Real Estate Valuers and Appraisers, 93-98.
  • Jackson, G 2008, ‘Easements and wayleaves for sewers, pipelines and cables’, in Hayward, R (Ed) Valuation: Principles into Practice, Estates Gazette London.
  • Jacobs, M 2010, Law of Compulsory Land Acquisition, Law Book Co, Sydney.
  • . Kater v The Electricity Transmission Authority of New South Wales NSWLEC, 1993
  • Kelly, M 2012, ‘Gas down below tops mine above’, Newcastle Herald, 14 January 2012.
  • Lang, W and Smith, B 1998, ‘Valuing a gas pipeline easement: A history and synthesis of methodology’, Right of Way, September/October 1998, 25-47.
  • Larmer, J 2000, ‘ The valuation of gas and oil pipeline easements on farmland’, Specialist valuations in Australia and New Zealand: Theory and practice, Australian Property Institute, Deakin.
  • Macdonald-Smith, A 2012, ‘Farmers warm to Santos’ CSG deal’, Australian Financial Review, 26 June 2012.
  • Maloney, B 1971, ‘Some factors to consider when valuing easements’, The Valuer, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 374-378.
  • . Messer & Messer v Rossi & Others [2001] QLRT 6
  • , NSW Mining Warden.Ltdv Ulan Coal,2008
  • , NSW Mining Warden.Newbridge Slate Pty Ltd v Dapila Mining Ltd, 1997
  • NSW Government 2012, Draft code of practice for coal seam gas exploration, NSW Trade and Investment, Sydney.
  • NSW Land and Property Information 2014, Study on the impact of the coal seam gas industry on land values in NSW, NSW Government, Sydney.
  • New South Wales Legislative Council General Purpose Standing Committee No. 5, Coal seam gas, May 2012, NSW Government, Sydney.
  • . NSW Petroleum [Onshore] Act 1991
  • . NSW Petroleum Act 1955
  • “Riverina” 1937, “Unimproved value in relation to country land’, The Valuer, October 1937, pp. 497-499.
  • Scarr, P 2004, ‘Sullivan oil company of Australia and its relevance throughout Australia’, Australian Mining andPetroleum Law Association Yearbook 2004, pp. 561-573.
  • . Smith v. Cameron (1986) 11 QLCR 64
  • .Sullivan and Sullivan v Oil Company of Australia Limited and Santos Petroleum Operations Pty Ltd, [2003] QLRT 2
  • .Sullivan and Sullivan v Oil Company of Australia Limited and Santos Petroleum Operations Pty Ltd, Re [2003] QCA 570
  • .Wills v Minerva Coal Pty Ltd QLC/1998/149
  • White, DS 1999, ‘Compensation for mining in Australia’, Australian Mining and Petroleum Law Association Year Book 1999, pp. 324-333.
  • Yin R 2009, Case study research, Sage, Los Angeles.
  • . Zimmerebner v Hawkins and Anor (1999) 20 QLCR 71