Home • PRRES Inc. Journal • Read the Journal

Formative Assessment in Property Education: A Comparison Between Blended and Online Learning

Author/s: Sharon Yam, Peter Rossini

Date Published: 1/01/2013

Published in: Volume 19 - 2013 Issue 1 (pages 101 - 127)

Abstract

Formative assessment is of vital importance to enhance student learning. Students are able to apply their knowledge by completing formative exercises and given the opportunity to rectify their mistakes prior to attempting the summative assessment. Feedback provided for formative assessment has been recognised as central in enhancing student learning as students can use this to reinforce their understanding of the subject. The paper is based on an exploratory research project using student survey data as well as records of students’ performance and activities over the first semester of 2012. The purpose is to study how two groups of property students exposed to different modes of learning responded to the online and traditional formative assessment. The student perceptions and the statistical relationship between formative and summative assessment will be analysed using quantitative analysis techniques. The research shows that both groups of students, internal (blended) and external (online) students, have benefited from the range of formative assessments offered in this first-year property course, albeit to a different extent. Property academics should, therefore, make good use of formative assessment to enhance student engagement and virtual classroom might be a solution to further engage external students. Besides highlighting challenges, student perceptions and the usefulness of formative assessment, the paper also provides recommendations for future research.

Download Full Article

Download the Full Article PDF

14445921.2013.11104376.pdf 14445921.2013.11104376.pdf (485kB)

Keywords

Formative Assessment - Online Test - Practice Quiz - Property Education - Summative Assessment

References

  • Anderson RI, Loviscek AL and Webb JR 2000, ‘Problem-based learning in real estate education’, Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education, Vol.3, pp. 35-41.
  • Arbaugh JB 2005, ‘Is there an optimal design for on-line MBA courses?’,Academy of Management Learning and Education, Vol. 4, pp. 135–149.
  • Asan A 2003, ‘School experience course with multimedia in teacher education’, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 19, pp. 21-34.
  • Bangert-Drowns RL, Kulik JA and Kulik CLC 1991, ‘Effect of frequent classroom testing’, Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 85, pp. 89-99.
  • Biggs J 2003, Aligning teaching and assessing to course objectives, Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: New Trends and Innovations Conference, 13-17 April, University of Aveiro.
  • Biggs J and Tang C 2007, Teaching for quality learning at university: what the student does, 3rdEd, Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, Maidenhead.
  • Black P and William D 1998, ‘Assessment and classroom learning’, Assessment and Education, Vol. 5, pp. 7-74.
  • Bodzin AM and Cates W 2003, ‘Enhancing preservice teachers’ understanding of web-based scientific inquiry’, Journal of Science Teacher Education, Vol. 14, pp. 237-257.
  • Born WL 2003, ‘A real estate fundamentals project to enhance learning’, Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education, Vol. 6, pp. 239-254.
  • Boyd T 2010, ‘Are we exemplars for the property profession?’,Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, Vol. 16, pp. 126-140.
  • Boyle JT and Nicol DJ 2003, ‘Using classroom communication systems to support interaction and discussion in large class settings’, Association for Learning Technology Journal, Vol. 11, pp. 43-57.
  • Buchanan T 2000, ‘The efficacy of a world-wide web mediated formative assessment’, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 16, pp. 193-200.
  • Burrow M, Evdorides H, Hallam B and Freer-Hewish R 2005, ‘Developing formative assessments for postgraduate students in engineering’, European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.30, pp. 255-263.
  • Centre for Technology in Learning 2009, Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: a meta-analysis and review of online learning studies, US Dept of Education, Washington, DC.
  • Cole JM and Hilliard VR 2006, ‘The effect of web-based reading curriculum on children’s reading performance and motivation’, Journal of Educational Computing Research, Vol. 34, pp. 353-380.
  • Cornish S, Reed R and Wilkinson S 2009, ‘Incorporating new technology into the delivery of property education’, Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, Vol. 15, pp. 303-320.
  • deLeon L and Killian J 2000, ‘Comparing modes of delivery: classroom and on-line (and other) learning’, Journal of Public Affairs Education’, Vol. 6, pp. 5-18.
  • Freeman R and Lewis R 1998, Planning and implementing assessment, London, Kogan Page.
  • Gardner L, Sheridan D and White D 2002, ‘A web-based learning and assessment system to support flexible education’, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 18, pp. 125-136.
  • Garrison DR and Kanuka H 2004, ‘Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in higher education’, Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 7, pp. 95-105.
  • Goldfinch J and Hughes M 2007, ‘Skills, learning styles and success of first-year undergraduates’, Active Learning in Higher Education, Vol. 8, pp. 259-273.
  • Hargreaves E 2005, ‘Assessment for learning? thinking outside the (black) box’, Cambridge Journal of Education, Vol. 35, pp. 213-224.
  • Hefferan M and Ross S 2010, ‘Forces for change in property education and research in Australia’, Property Management, Vol. 28, pp. 370-381.
  • Henly DC 2003, ‘Use of web-based formative assessment to support student learning in a metabolism/nutrition unit’, European Journal of Dental Education, Vol. 7, pp. 116-122.
  • Higgins C and Bligh B 2006, Formative computer-based assessment in diagram based domains, The 11thAnnual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, pp. 98-102, 26-28 June, Bologna, Italy,. (Accessed 6 September 2012).Retrieved from http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/1150000/1140152/p98-higgins.pdf?ip=130.220.71.19&acc=ACTIVE%20SERVICE&CFID=152535661&CFTOKEN=17907485&__acm__=1346895133_20cb24bd8bf66792c1c92a12fc10009d
  • Higgins R, Hartley P and Skelton A 2001, ‘Getting the message across: the problem of communicating assessment feedback’, Teaching in Higher Education, Vol. 6, pp. 269–274.
  • Ivanic R, Clark R and Rimmershaw R 2000, ‘What am I supposed to make of this? The messages conveyed to students by tutors’ written comments, in: MR Lea and B Stierer (eds) Student writing in higher education: new contexts, Open University Press, Buckingham, pp. 47-65.
  • Iverson AM, Iverson GL and Lukin LE 1994, ‘Frequent, ungraded testing as an instructional strategy’, Journal of Experimental Education, Vol. 62, pp. 93-101.
  • Jones BD 2003, ‘Students as web site authors: effects on motivation and achievement’, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, Vol. 31, pp. 441-461.
  • Kift S 2004, Organising first year engagement around learning: formal and informal curriculum intervention, The 8 Pacific Rim First Year in Higher Education Conference, 14 - 16 July, Melbourne, Victoria.
  • Koulizos P 2006, Property education: how should it be taught?’, The 12 Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference, 22-25 January, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Krause K and Coates H 2008, ‘Students’ engagement in first-year university’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 33, pp. 493-505.
  • Krause K, Hartley R, James R and McInnis C 2005, The first year experience in Australian universities: findings from a decade of national studies, DEST, Canberra.
  • Laurillard D 2002, Rethinking university teaching: a conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies, 2 Ed, Routledge Falmer, London.
  • Lea SJ, Stephenson D and Troy J 2003, ‘Higher education students’ attitudes to student-centred learning: beyond ‘educational bulimia’?’, Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 28, pp. 321-334.
  • Lowes S, Lin P and Wang Y 2007, ‘Studying the effectiveness of the discussion forum in online professional development courses’, Journal of Interactive Online Learning, Vol. 6, pp. 181-210.
  • Mak MY, Sher WD and Williams AP 2010, Students’ evaluation of an online postgraduate property program, The 16 Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference, 24-27 January, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Martinez JGR and Martinez NC 1992, ‘Re-examining repeated testing and teacher effects in a remedial mathematics course’, British Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 62, pp. 356-363.
  • Nicol DJ and Macfarlane-Dick D 2006, ‘Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice’, Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 31, pp. 199-218.
  • Nuthall G and Alton-Lee A 1995, ‘Assessing classroom learning: How students use their knowledge and experience to answer classroom achievement test questions in science and social studies’, American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 32, pp. 185-223.
  • Peat M and Franklin S 2002, ‘Supporting student learning: the use of computer-based formative assessment modules’, British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 33, pp. 515-523.
  • Pintrich PR 1995, Understandig self-regulated learning, Jossey-Bass, San Franscisco, CA.
  • Pintrich PR and Zusho A 2002, ‘Student motivation and self-regulated learninig in the college classroom’, in JC Smart and WG Tierney (Eds) Higher Education: handbook of theory and research, Vol. XVII, Agathon Press, New York.
  • Ramaprasad A 1983, ‘On the definition of feedback’, Behavioral Science, Vol. 2, pp. 4-13.
  • Ramsden P 2003, Learning to teach in higher education, Routledge, London.
  • Sadler DR 1989, ‘Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems’, Instructional Science, Vol. 18, pp. 119-144.
  • Sadler DR 1998, ‘Formative assessment: revisiting the territory’, Assessment in Education, Vol. 5, pp. 77-84.
  • Sander P, Stevenson K, King M and Coates D 2000, ‘University students expectations of teaching’, Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 25, pp. 309-323.
  • Santally M and Raverdy J 2006, ‘The master’s program in computer-mediated computer communications: a comparative study of two cohorts of students’, Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 54, pp. 312-326.
  • Schloss PJ, Smith MA and Posluzsny M 1990, ‘The impact of formative and summative assessment upon test performance of science education majors’, Teacher Education and Special Education Majors, Vol. 13, pp. 3-8.
  • Shepard LA 2005, ‘Linking formative assessment to scaffolding’, Educational Leadership, November, pp. 66-70.
  • Shen Q, Chung JKH, Challis D and Cheung RCT 2007, ‘A comparative study of student performance in traditional mode and online mode of learning’, Computer Applications in Engineering Education, Vol. 15, pp. 30-40.
  • Sly L 1999, ‘Practice test as formative assessment improve student performance on computer-managed learning assessment’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 24, pp. 339-343.
  • Spiro RJ and Jehng J 1990, ‘Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: theory and technology for the nonlinear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter’, in D. Nix and R. Spiro (eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 163-205.
  • Strawitz BM 1989, ‘The effect of testing on science process skill achievement’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 26, pp. 659-664.
  • Susilawati C and Peach D 2012, Challenges of measuring learning outcomes for property students engaged in work integrated learning, The 18th Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference, 15-18 January, Adelaide.
  • University of South Australia 2010, About moodle. http://www.unisa.edu.au/learnonline/staff/about_moodle.asp(Accessed 12 August 2011).
  • Velan GM, Kumar RK, Dziegielewski M and Wakefield D 2002, ‘Web-based self-assessment in pathology with questionmark perception’, Pathology, Vol. 34, pp. 282-284.
  • Wang TH 2008, ‘Web-based quiz-game-like formative assessment: development and evaluation’, Computers and Education, Vol. 51, pp. 1247-1263.
  • Wolverton ML and Wolverton M 2003, ‘An asynchronous augmentation to traditional course delivery’, Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education, Vol. 6, pp. 225-238.
  • Yam S and Rossini P 2010, ‘Effectiveness of project-based learning as a strategy for property education’, Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, Vol. 16, pp. 291-313.
  • Yam S and Rossini P 2012, ‘Online learning and blended learning: Experience from a first-year undergraduate property valuation course’, Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, Vol. 18, pp. 129-148.
  • Yorke M 2001, ‘Formative assessment and its relevance to retention’, Higher Education Research and Development, Vol. 20, pp. 115-126.
  • Yorke M 2003, ‘Formative assessment in higher education: moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice’, Higher Education, Vol. 45, pp. 477-501.
  • Zimmerman BJ and Schunk DH 2001, Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: theoretical perspective, Lawrence Erlbaum Associate, Mahwah, NJ.