Assessing Property Student Satisfaction with their Property Education Experience in an Australian University

Author/s: Graeme Newell

Date Published: 1/01/2013

Published in: Volume 19 - 2013 Issue 2 (pages 133 - 149)

Abstract

Recent years have seen an increased focus on the effective delivery of property education programs in Australian universities. In particular, assessing student satisfaction with their property education experience has been a key performance measure for most universities. This paper examines student satisfaction across all years of the property degree in a major Australian university over 2005-2011, benchmarked against the level of student satisfaction in the other business disciplines of accounting, economics and finance, law, marketing and management. A range of innovative formats are used, such as "green lights" to show high student satisfaction. Importantly, this analysis provides a much richer understanding of the students' satisfaction with their property education experience throughout their property degree, instead of just being focused on graduating property students. The results clearly highlight the high level of overall student satisfaction with the property education experience, exceeding the satisfaction levels achieved by the other business disciplines. A range of property education implications and "lessons learnt from results" for other property programs are also highlighted from this property student satisfaction analysis.

Download Full Article

Download the Full Article PDF

14445921.2013.11104377.pdf 14445921.2013.11104377.pdf (125kB)

Keywords

Benchmarking - Comparative Analysis - Individual Subject Evaluations - Property Education - Student Satisfaction - “Green Light” Format

References

  • Anderson, E and Sullivan, H 1993, ‘The antecedents and consequences of customer satisfaction for firms’, Marketing Science, Vol. 12, pp. 125-143.
  • Australian Council for Educational Research 2012, University Experience Survey 2012, ACER.
  • Avdiev, R 2000, ‘Golden apple or poisoned chalice: the influence of education on careers’, Australian Property Journal, Vol. 36, pp. 270-272.
  • Baxter, J 2007, ‘Re-engineering a valuation degree: how did we get here and where do we go?’, Journal of Property Investment and Finance, Vol. 25, pp. 444-467.
  • Bedggood, R and Donovan, J 2012, ‘University performance evaluations: what are we really measuring?’, Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 37, pp. 825-842.
  • Bedggood, R and Pollard, R 2001, Customer satisfaction and teacher evaluation in higher education, 10 World Marketing Congress, Cardiff.
  • Blake, A, Cradduck, L, Richardson, K and Eves, C 2010, ‘Real property law: its place in Australian real estate programs’, Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education, Vol. 13, pp. 131-140.
  • Blake, A and Susilawati, C 2009, ‘An evaluation of how well undergraduate property students are prepared for commencing their careers’, Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, Vol. 15, pp. 204-224.
  • Bolton, R 1998, ‘A dynamic model of the duration of the customer’s relationship with a continuous service provider: the role of satisfaction’, Marketing Science, Vol. 17, pp. 45-65.
  • Boyd, T 2000a, ‘CPD: change the product’, Australian Property Journal, Vol. 36, pp. 279-282.
  • Boyd, T 2000b, ‘Educating the property professional of tomorrow’, Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, Vol. 6, pp. 45-60.
  • Boyd, T 2010, ‘Are we exemplars for the property profession?’, Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, Vol. 16, pp. 126-140.
  • Chandon, P, Morwitz, V and Reinartz, W 2005, ‘Do intentions really predict behaviour? Selfgenerated validity effects in survey research’, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 69, pp. 1-14.
  • Clayson, D 1999, ‘Students’ evaluation of teaching effectiveness: Some implications of stability’, Journal of Marketing Education, Vol. 21, pp. 68-75.
  • Cornish, S, Reed, R and Wilkinson, S 2009, ‘Incorporating new technology into the delivery of property education’, Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, Vol. 15, pp. 305-320.
  • Everist, L, Francis, V and Armitage, L 2005, ‘Student preferences for career mentoring in property and construction’, Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, Vol. 11, pp. 337-354.
  • Fischer, D 2000, ‘Is the valuation paradigm a paradigm’, Australian Property Journal, Vol. 36, pp. 292-299.
  • Guolla, M 1999, ‘Assessing the teaching quality to student satisfaction relationship: applied customer satisfaction research in the classroom’, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, Vol. 7, pp. 87-97.
  • Harnash-Glazer, M and Meyer, J 1991, ‘Dimensions of satisfaction with college education’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 16, pp. 95-107.
  • Johnson, L, Dotson, M and Dunlap, B 1988, ‘Service quality determinants and effectiveness in the real estate brokerage industry’, Journal of Real Estate Research, Vol. 3, pp. 21-36.
  • Kane, D, Williams, J and Cappuccini-Ansfield, G 2008, ‘Student satisfaction surveys: the value in taking an historic perspective’, Quality in Higher Education, Vol. 14, pp. 135-155.
  • Kettinger, W and Lee, C 1995, ‘Perceived service quality and user satisfaction with the information services function’, Decision Sciences, Vol. 25, pp. 737-766.
  • Keiningham, T, Cooil, B, Aksoy, L, Andreassen, T and Weiner, J 2007, ‘The value of different customer satisfaction and loyalty metrics in predicting customer retention, recommendation and share-of-wallet’, Managing Service Quality, Vol. 17, pp. 361-384.
  • Keiningham, T, Perkins-Munn, T and Evans, H 2003, ‘The impact of customer satisfaction on share of wallet in a business-to-business environment’, Journal of Service Research, Vol. 6, pp. 37-50.
  • Krehbiel, T, McClure, R and Pratsini, E 1997, ‘Using student disconfirmation as a measure of classroom effectiveness’, Journal of Education for Business, Vol. 72, pp. 224-229.
  • LaBarbera, P and Mazursky, D 1983, ‘A longitudinal assessment of consumer satisfaction/dissatisfaction: the dynamic aspect of the cognitive process’, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 20, pp. 393-404.
  • Licata, J and Frankwick, G 1996, ‘University marketing: a professional service organization perspective’, Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Vol. 7, pp. 1-16.
  • Liegler, R 1997, ‘Predicting student satisfaction in baccalaureate nursing programs: testing a causal model’, Journal of Nursing Education, Vol. 36, pp. 357-364.
  • Loveman, G 1988, ‘Employee satisfaction, customer loyalty and financial performance: an empirical examination of the service profit chain in retail banking’, Journal of Service Research, Vol. 1, pp. 18-31.
  • McDaniel, J and Louargand, M 1994, ‘Real estate brokerage service quality: an examination’, Journal of Real Estate Research, Vol. 9, pp. 339-351.
  • Mazzarol, T and Hosie, P 1996, ‘Exporting Australian higher education: future strategies in a maturing market’, Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 4, pp. 37-50.
  • Mittal, V and Kamakura, W 2001, ‘Satisfaction, repurchase intent and repurchase behaviour: investigating the moderating effect of customer characteristics’, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 38, pp. 131-142.
  • Morgan, N and Rego, L 2006, ‘The value of different customer satisfaction and loyalty metrics in predicting business performance’, Marketing Science, Vol. 25, pp. 426-439.
  • Nair, C, Adam, P and Mertova, P 2008, ‘Student engagement: the key to improving survey response rates’, Quality in Higher Education, Vol. 14, pp. 225-232.
  • Nair, C and Shah, M 2011, ‘Developing an effective student feedback and improvement system: exemplars with proven success’, Australian Quality Forum 2011, Melbourne.
  • Nelson, S and Nelson, T 1995, ‘RESERV: An instrument for measuring real estate brokerage service quality’, Journal of Real Estate Research, Vol. 10, pp. 99-113.
  • Newell, G 2003, ‘The quality of property education in Australia’, Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, Vol. 9, pp. 361-378.
  • Newell, G 2004, ‘Client perceptions of the quality of valuation reports in Australia’, Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, Vol. 10, pp. 437-450.
  • Newell, G 2007, ‘Challenges and opportunities for property academics’, Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, Vol. 13, pp. 136-145.
  • Newell, G and Eves, C 2000, ‘Recent developments in property education in Australia’, Australian Property Journal, Vol. 36, pp. 275-278.
  • Newell, G and Mallik, G 2011, ‘The importance of mathematics background and student performance in a property degree’, Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, Vol. 17, pp. 313-328.
  • Newell, G, Susilawati, C and Yam, S 2010, ‘Student perceptions of the quality of property education in Australia: 1994-2009’, Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, Vol. 16, pp. 400-422.
  • Page, G 2008, ‘Australian graduates’ perspective on their professional socialisation’, Australian and New Zealand Property Journal, Vol. 1, pp. 561-570.
  • Reidenbach, R and Sandifer-Smallwood, B 1990, ‘Exploring perceptions of hospital operations by a modified SERVQUAL approach’, Journal of Healthcare Marketing, Vol. 10, pp. 47-55.
  • Richardson, J 2005, ‘Instruments for obtaining student feedback: a review of the literature’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 30, pp. 387-415.
  • Rust, R and Zahoick, A 1993, ‘Customer satisfaction, customer retention and market share’, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 69, pp. 193-215.
  • Scott, D and Shieff, D 1993, ‘Service quality components and group criteria in local governments’, International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol. 4, pp. 42-53.
  • Seiler, V, Seiler, M, Arndt, A, Newell, G and Webb, J 2010, ‘Measuring service quality with instrument variation in an SEM framework’, Journal of Housing Research, Vol. 19, pp. 47-63.
  • Seiler, V, Seiler, M and Webb, J 2006, ‘Impact of homebuyer characteristics on service quality in real estate brokerage’, International Real Estate Review, Vol. 9, pp. 44-61.
  • Seiler, V, Seiler, M, Winkler, D, Newell, G and Webb, J 2008, ‘Service quality dimensions in residential real estate brokerage’, Journal of Housing Research, Vol. 17, pp. 101-117.
  • Seiler, V, Webb, J and Whipple, T 2000, ‘Assessment of real estate brokerage service quality with a practicing professional’s instrument’, Journal of Real Estate Research, Vol. 20, pp. 105-117.
  • Shah, M and Nair, C 2009, ‘Using student voice to improve student satisfaction: two Australian universities, the same agenda’, Journal of Institutional Research (South East Asia), Vol. 7, pp. 43-55.
  • Shah, M and Widin, J 2010, ‘Indigenous students’ voices: monitoring indigenous student satisfaction and retention in a large Australian university’, Journal of Institutional Research, Vol. 15, pp. 28-41.
  • Stewart, K 1991, ‘Applying a marketing orientation to a higher education setting’, Journal of Professional Services Marketing, Vol. 7, pp. 117-124.
  • Taylor, S, Sharland, A, Cronin, J and Bullard, W 1993, ‘Recreational service quality in the international setting’, International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol. 4, pp. 68-86.
  • Wiers-Jenssen, J, Stensaker, B and Grogaard, J 2002, ‘Student satisfaction: towards an empirical deconstruction of the concept’, Quality in Higher Education, Vol. 8, pp. 183-195.
  • Yam, S 2012, ‘Tutoring - what do our first-year real estate undergraduates expect’, Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, Vol. 18, pp. 319-333.
  • Yam, S and Rossini, P 2010, ‘Effectiveness of project-based learning as a strategy for property education’, Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, Vol. 16, pp. 291-313.
  • Yam, S and Rossini, P 2012, ‘Online learning and blended learning: experience from a firstyear undergraduate property valuation course’, Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, Vol. 18, pp. 129-148.