The Impacts of the Canterbury Earthquakes on the Commercial Office Market in Christchurch, New Zealand
Author/s: Sandy Bond, Zoltan Moricz, Craig Wong
Date Published: 1/01/2012
Published in: Volume 18 - 2012 Issue 4 (pages 389 - 405)
Abstract
The 22 February 2011 Canterbury earthquake had a devastating impact on Christchurch property with significant damage caused to land and buildings. The broad aims of the research were to examine the nature and extent of the CBD office relocation, determine occupier’s perceptions of the future: their location and space needs post the February earthquake and the likelihood of relocating back to the CBD after the rebuild. An online survey was developed with the web link and a covering letter emailed to 643 companies. A follow-up survey was sent out in January 2012 following the December 2011 earthquake event to determine if respondents’ location choices had changed. From the initial survey, 55% of respondents were relocated CBD occupiers and 45% were existing suburban office occupiers. Of the businesses that relocated out of the CBD the biggest group (38%) want to return to the CBD into low-rise buildings of 3 floors or less (80%) that meet earthquake codes with good amenities and public transport. The speed of rebuild is important to respondents. The follow up survey indicated that demand for the CBD has fallen since the initial survey. In terms of building grade preferences, the response from occupiers is that although higher quality Premium or A-Grade buildings are preferred, when taking into account likely rental levels, occupiers prefer lower quality new or existing buildings. The concern with new builds is that rentals are likely to be too high for tenants to afford which was illustrated by the gap analysis of respondent expectations of rents and the indicative market rentals that will need to be achieved to make the rebuild feasible.Download Full Article
Download the Full Article PDF14445921.2012.11104369.pdf (800kB) |
Keywords
Building Preferences - Canterbury Earthquake - Office RelocationReferences
- Anderson Lloyd Lawyers 2010, Canterbury Earthquake - Some Advice for Businesses, Fact Sheet, http://www.andersonlloyd.co.nz/uploads/files/Canterbury_Earthquake_Some_Advice_for_B usinesses.pdf(Accessed 5 May 2012).
- Appraisal Institute 2011, Proposed guide note 10, developing an opinion of market value in the aftermath of a disaster, Appraisal Institute, Chicago - Seehttp://www.appraisalinstitute.org/PPC/downloads/2011_guide_note_10.pdf [accessed 5 May 2012].
- Brunette, D 1995. ‘Natural disasters and commercial real estate returns’, Real Estate Finance, Winter, Vol. 11, No.4 pp. 67–72.
- Buddle Findlay 2012, Legal update on property and construction: the progress of earthquake- related demolitions in Christchurch, 12 February, http://www.buddlefindlay.com/sites/all/files/The_progress_of_earthquake_related_demolitio ns in Christchurch 0.pdf(Accessed 5 May 2012).
- Buhayar, N, Greber, J and Saminather, N 2011. ‘New Zealand’s earthquake may become costliest insured disaster since 2008’, Bloomberg. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011–02–22/new-zealand-s-earthquake-may-become-costliest-insured-disaster-since-2008.html. (Accessed 24 February 2011).
- CERA 2012, Demolitions, http://cera.govt.nz/demolitions/list(Accessed 27 April 2012).
- CERA n.d.(a), The Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Commission, http://cera.govt.nz/about-cera/cerc, (Accessed 29 October 2012).
- CERA n.d.(b), About CERA, http://cera.govt.nz/about-cera, (Accessed 29 October 2012).
- Cole, W 2011, ‘Flood zone revisions and economic loss: an example from Florida’, The Appraisal Journal, Winter, pp. 44–56.
- Crowe, C 2012, Canterbury Quake Live, http://www.canterburyquakelive.co.nz/, (Accessed 30 October 2012).
- Epley, D 2010, ‘ Reconsidering the definition of highest and best use: the case for a post-disaster highest and best use’, Real Estate Issues, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 59–71.
- Harcourts Grenadier 2012, Rebuild underway on Harcourts Grenadier flagship, Autumn, p.1.http://photos.harcourts.co.nz/Harcourts.Public.WebTemplates/695/Files/Grenadier Autumn Newsletter Feb 2012–7.pdf(Accessed 5 May 2012).
- Heather, B 2011, City Rebuild Under Way, The Press, 10 December,http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/christchurch-earthquake-2011/6118679/City-rebuild-under-way(Accessed 6 May 2012).
- Levy, LS 1986, ‘Landslides: implication on the appraisal process’, The Real Estate Appraiser and Analyst, Spring, pp. 5–11.
- Levy, LS 1984, ‘Casualty loss appraisals of landslide damaged real estate’, The Real Estate Appraiser and Analyst, Fall, pp. 8–12.
- New Zealand Law Society 2010, Law Society comments on Canterbury Earthquake Act: Media Release, http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1009/S00365/law-society-comments-on-canterbury-earthquake-act.htm, (Accessed 29 October 2012).
- New Zealand Police 2012, List of Deceased, 9 February,http://www.police.govt.nz/list-deceased, (Accessed 29 October 2012).
- Nicolay, C 2010, ‘After the storm: appraisal challenges in Katrina’s wake’, Valuation Insights and Perspectives, Fourth Quarter, pp. 16–23.
- Sanders, MV 1996, ‘Post-repair diminution in value from geotechnical problems’, The Appraisal Journal, January.
- Seefeldt, J 2006, ‘Life after Katrina: relief foundation helps appraisers regroup’, Valuation Insights and Perspectives, Third Quarter, pp. 5–9.
- The Field Connection 2011, New beginnings - Christchurch CBD: evolution from an earthquake,http://www.fieldconnection.co.nz/New%20Beginnings%20-%20Christchurch%20CBD.pdf (Accessed 5 May 2012).
- The Labour Department 2011, A Changing landscape: the impact of the earthquakes on Christchurch workplaces, http://www.dol.govt.nz/publications/research/earthquakes-impact- in-christchurch-workplaces/earthquake-impact-in-christchruch.pdf(Accessed 5 May 2012).
- The New Zealand Herald 2011, Christchurch earthquake - quick facts, 22 February,http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10708024, (Accessed 29 October 2012).
- Wikipedia 2012, 2011 Christchurch earthquake, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011 Christchurch earthquake, (Accessed 29 October 2012).