Home • PRRES Inc. Journal • Read the Journal

The Voice Behind Shoice: Understanding Key Motives that Drive Consumer Home Choice

Author/s: Catheryn Khoo-Lattimore, Maree Thyne

Date Published: 1/01/2008

Published in: Volume 14 - 2008 Issue 1 (pages 81 - 94)

Abstract

Despite the huge importance of the residential real estate market to New Zealand’s economy, our knowledge of the non-calculative reasons that drive home buyers’ choices is limited. This interpretive study sought to identify and understand the motives that underlie actual home choices through ZMET (Zaltman Metaphor Elicitation Technique). This paper focuses on Step Eight of the ZMET interview process where respondents have created mental maps using constructs that have been elicited throughout the interview. It identifies twenty key motives underlying home choices, presents three of these motives in detail and discusses their implications for academics and practitioners. It then concludes with a contribution to existing housing choice literature - that consumers’ choice for a home can be driven by non-economic, non-calculative and less tangible factors.

Download Full Article

Download the Full Article PDF

14445921.2008.11104249.pdf 14445921.2008.11104249.pdf (215kB)

Keywords

Buyer Motivation - Qualitative Research - Real Estate Research

References

  • Bates, S & Kane, C 2003, The Future of Housing in New Zealand, Centre for Housing Research New Zealand.
  • Black, RT, Brown, MG, Diaz, J, Gibler, KM & Grisson, TV 2003, ‘Behavioral Research in Real Estate: A Search for the Boundaries ‘, Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 85 - 112.
  • Black, RT & Diaz, J 1996, ‘The use of Information versus Asking Price in the Real Property Negotiation Process’, Journal of Property Research, vol. 13, pp. 287-97.
  • Catchings-Castello, G 2000, ‘The ZMET alternative’, Marketing Research, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 6-12.
  • Christensen, GL & Olson, JC 2002, ‘Mapping consumers’ mental models with ZMET’, Psychology and Marketing, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 477-501.
  • Clapham, D 2002, ‘Housing Pathways: A Post Modern Analytical Framework’, Housing, Theory and Society, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 57-68.
  • Coolen, H & van Montfort, X 2001, ‘Meaning-based Representations of Preferences for Housing Attributes’, in Housing Imaginations: New Concepts, New Theories, New Researchers. OTB Research Institute for Housing, Urban and Mobility StudiesDelft University of Technology Thijsseweg 112629 JA Delft, The Netherlands.
  • Crews, G & Dyhrberg, K 2004, ‘Real Estate Consumer Survey 2003’, Real Estate Institue of NZ, p. 81.
  • D’Arcy, E & Kaleva, H 2003, ‘Real Estate Service Markets and The Informed Client: Towards a Research Agenda’, PRRES 9th Annual Conference Proceeding.
  • de Bruin, A & Flint-Hartle, S 2003, ‘A bounded rationality framework for property investment behaviour’, Journal of Property Investment & Finance, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 271 84.
  • Diaz III, J & Hansz, A 2007, ‘Understanding the Behavioural Pradigm in Property Research’, Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 16-34.
  • DTZ, NZ 2004, Changes in the Structure of the New Zealand Housing Market Executive Summary, Centre for Housing Research New Zealand 0-9582553-O-X.
  • DTZ, NZ 2005, Housing Tenure Aspirations and Attainment, Centre for Housing Research New Zealand.
  • Dupuis, A & Thorns, DC 1998, ‘Home, Home Ownership and the Search for Ontological Security’, Sociological Review, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 24-47.
  • Findsen, AT 2005, Buying a 1st Home, GenX in the Auckland Housing Market, The University of Auckland.
  • Gibler, KM & Nelson, SL 2003, ‘Consumer Behaviour Applications to Real Estate Education’, Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 63-83.
  • Harper, D 2002, ‘Talking about pictures: a case for photo elicitation’, Visual Studies, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 13-26.
  • Jameson, B, Nana, G 2004, ‘The Impact of Financial Circumstances on Tenure Choices in New Zealand’, CHRANZ, no. June, p. 38. Report.
  • Lee, MSY, McGoldrick, PJ, Keeling, KA & Doherty, J 2003, ‘Using ZMET to explore barriers to the adoption of 3G mobile banking services’, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 340-8.
  • Levy, DS & Lee, C 2006, ‘Qualitative Methodology and Grounded Theory in Property Research’, Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 369 - 88.
  • Levy, DS, Murphy, L & Lee, C 2008, ‘Influences and Emotions: Exploring household decision-making processes when buying a house.’ Housing Studies, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 271 89.
  • Levy, DS, Murphy, L & Lee, C forthcoming, ‘Influences and Emotions: Exploring household decision-making processes when buying a house.’ Housing Studies, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 271-89.
  • Reed, R & Conisbee, N 2005, ‘Identifying Linkages Between Generations and Dommunity Development - the Effect on Residential and Retail Property’, 11th Annual Pacific Rim Real Estate Conference, University of Melbourne, Australia.
  • Reisenzein, R & Hofmann, T 1990, ‘An investigation of dimensions of cognitive appraisal in emotion using the repertory grid technique’, Motivation and Emotion, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1-26.
  • Reynolds, TJ & Gutman, J 1988, ‘Laddering Theory, Method’, Analysis and Interpretation, Journal.
  • Sease, KG 2005, Mapping Cognitive Constructs in Males and Females Using ZMET Methodology Comparing Male and Female Experience Within a Campus Ministry Organization, Miami University, Dept. Communication.
  • Shaw, MLG & McKnight, C 1992, ‘Think Again. Personal Decision-Making and Problem-Solving’. Centre for Person-Computer Studies, Calgary, Alberta, Can.
  • Spiggle, S 1994, ‘Analysis and Interpretation of Qualitative Data in Consumer Research’, The Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 491-503.
  • Sujan, M, Bettman, JR & Baumgartner, H 1993, ‘Influencing Consumer Judgments Using Autobiographical Memories: A Self-Referencing Perspective’, Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 422-36.
  • Susilawati, C, Anunu, F.B. 2001, ‘Motivation and Perception Factors Influence Buying Home Behaviour in Dilli, East Timor’, 7th Pacific Rim Real Estate Annual Conference Proceedings, Pacific Rim Real Estate Society, Adelaide, Australia.
  • Thyne, M 2001, ‘The Importance of Values Research for Nonprofit Organisations: The Motivation-Based Values of Museum Visitors’, International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 116-30.
  • Timmermans, HJP & van Noortwijk, L 1995, ‘Context Dependencies in Housing Choice Behavior’, Environment and Planning A, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 181-92.
  • Veludo-de-Oliveira, TM, Ikeda, AA & Campomar, MC 2006, ‘Laddering in the practice of marketing research: barriers and solutions’, International Journal, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 297 306.
  • Vorell, MS, Theses, OE & Center, D 2003, Application of the ZMET Methodology in an Organizational Context Comparing Black and White Student Subcultures in a University Setting, Miami University.
  • Watkins, J 2005, ‘Gen Y Knocking at the Door of Ownership’, The Washington Times, September 18, 2005.
  • Watkins, L 2006, Culture, Values and Japanese Tourism Behaviour, Doctor of Philosophy Thesis, University of Otago.
  • Winstanley, A, Thorns, DC & Perkins, HC 2002, ‘Moving House, Creating Home: Exploring Residnetial Mobility’, Housing Studies, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 813-32.
  • Winstanley, A, Thorns, DC & Perkins, HC 2003, ‘Nolstagia, Community and New Housing Developments: A Critique of New Urbanism Incorporating a New Zealand Perspective.’ Urban Policy and Research, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 175-89.
  • Woodside, AG 2004, ‘Advancing from subjective to confirmatory personal introspection in consumer research’, Psychology and Marketing, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 987-1010.
  • Zaltman, G 1997, ‘Rethinking Market Research: Putting People Back In’, Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 424-37.
  • Zaltman, G & Higie, R 1993, Seeing the Voice of the Customer: The Zaltman Metaphor Elicitation Technique, Marketing Science Institute, Massachusetts, 93-114.