Home • PRRES Inc. Journal • Read the Journal

Qualitative Methodology and Grounded Theory in Property Research

Author/s: Deborah Levy

Date Published: 1/01/2006

Published in: Volume 12 - 2006 Issue 4 (pages 369 - 388)

Abstract

Much of the research published in the property discipline consists of work utilising quantitative methods. While research gained using quantitative methods, if appropriately designed and rigorous, leads to results which are typically generalisable and quantifiable, it does not allow for a rich and in-depth understanding of a phenomenon. This is especially so if a researcher’s aim is to uncover the issues or factors underlying that phenomenon. Such an aim would require using a qualitative research methodology, and possibly an interpretive as opposed to a positivist theoretical perspective. The purpose of this paper is to provide a general overview of qualitative methodologies with the aim of encouraging a broadening of methodological approaches to overcome the positivist methodological bias which has the potential of inhibiting property behavioural research.

Download Full Article

Download the Full Article PDF

14445921.2006.11104216.pdf 14445921.2006.11104216.pdf (308kB)

Keywords

Grounded Theory - Qualitative Research Methods

References

  • Anastas, M., (1988), ‘For sensitive research studies, one-to-one interviews work best’, Bank Marketing, 20(7), pp 18-22
  • Berg, B.L., (2001), Qualitative Research Methods for Social Sciences, Fourth edition, Allyn and Bacon
  • Bonoma, T.V., (1985), Case-research in marketing: problems and opportunities and a process”, Journal of Marketing Research, XXII, pp 199-208
  • Carson, D., Gilmore, A., Perry, C. and Gronhaug, K., (2001), Qualitative Marketing Research, Sage Publications, London
  • Cassell, C., and Symon, G. (Eds.), (1994), Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research, Sage Publications, CA
  • Crotty, M., (1998), The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process, Allen and Unwin
  • Denzin, N K.,(1997), Interpretive EthnographEthnographic Practices for the 21st Century, Sage Publications, CA
  • Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S., (1998), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage Publications, CA
  • Dick, B. and Swepson, P. (1997) Action research FAQ: “frequently asked questions” file [On line]. Available at htt//www. scu.edu. au/schools/gcm/ar/arp/arfa
  • Donmoyer, R. (1990), “Generalizability and the single case study”, in Eisner, E., Peshkin, A. (Eds), Qualitative Research in Education: The Debate Continues, New York, NY.
  • Eisenhardt, K., (1989), “Building theories from case-study research”, Academy of Management Review, 14(4) pp 17-32
  • Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L., (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Chicago: Aldine
  • Hagan, F.E., (1993), Research Methods in Criminal Justice and Criminology, New York: Macmillan
  • Hirschheim, R. (1985), “Information systems epistemology: an historical perspective” in Research Methods in Information Systems, Mumford
  • Janesick, V. (1994). The dance of qualitative research design. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage Publications, CA.
  • Jean Lee, S.K. (1992). ‘Quantitative Versus Qualitative Research Methods - Two Approaches to Organisation Studies’ Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 9(1), pp 87 - 94
  • Levy, D. and Henry, M., (2003), ‘A comparative analysis of US, UK and Australian published property research methodologies and methods’ Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, 9(2), pp 148-162
  • Levy, D. and Schuck, E. (1999), “The Influence of Clients on Valuations” Journal of Property Investment and Finance, 17(4), 380-400.
  • Levy, D.S. AND Schuck, E. (2005), “The influence of clients on valuations: The clients perspective” Journal of Property Investment and Finance, Volume 23, No 2.
  • Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E.G., (1985), Naturalistic Enquiry, Sage, Newbury Park, CA
  • Maynard, M., (1994), “Methods, practice and epistemology: The debate about feminism and research”, Researching Women’s lives From a Feminist Perspective, eds Maynard and J. Purvis, Taylor and Francis, London, pp 10-26
  • Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A. M., (1994), Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications
  • Morgan A. K. and Drury V B., (2003) “Legitimising the Subjectivity of Human Reality Through Qualitative Research Method.” The Qualitative Report, 8 (1). http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR8-1/morgan.html
  • Myers, M., (1997), “Interpretive Research in Information Systems”, in J Mingers and F Stowell (Eds), Information Systems: An Emerging Discipline?, McGraw-Hill, London, pp 239-266
  • Olrlikowski, W.J. and Baroudi, J.J., (1991), “Studying information technology and the structure of organisations”, Information Systems Research, 2(1), pp 1-28
  • Patton, M.Q., (1990), Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, Sage, Newbury Park, CA
  • Perry, C., Reige, A. and Brown, L. (1999), ‘Realism’s role among scientific paradigms in marketing research’, Irish Marketing Review, 12(2), pp 16-23
  • Rushmore, S., (1993), ‘Ethics in hotel appraising’, The Appraisal Journal, 61(3), pp 357-363
  • Sokolow, H. (1985) “In-depth Interviews Increasing in Importance”, Marketing News 19(19), pp 26, 31
  • Strauss, A. and Corbin, J., (1998), ‘Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory’, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
  • Taylor, S. J. and Bogdan, R., (1998), “In-depth interviewing”, In S J Taylor & R Bogdan (eds) Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Guidebook and Resource John Wiley and Sons
  • Urquhart, C. and Fernandez, W., (2006), “Grounded theory method: The researcher as a blank slate and other myths’, Paper presented at the International Conference on Information Systems, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
  • Wallendorf, M. and Belk, R.W., (1989), “Assessing trustworthiness in naturalistic consumer research”, in E.C. Hirschman (ed.), Interpretive Consumer Research, Association for Consumer Research, Provo, UT, pp 115-132
  • Ward Schofield, J., (1993), ‘Increasing the Generalizability of Qualitative Research’ In: Hammersley, M., Ed, Social Research: Philosophy, Politics and Practice, SAGE, London.
  • Wolcott, H. F., (1990), Writing up qualitative research, Sage Publications, CA
  • Worzala, E.M., Lenk, M.M. and Kinnard, W.N. (1998), “How client pressure affects the appraisal of residential property”, The Appraisal Journal, October, pp 416-427
  • Yin, R.K., (2003), “Case-study research - design and methods”, (third edition) Applied Social Research Methods Series, 5, Sage Publications, CA
  • Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L. and Parasuraman, A., (1993), “The Nature and Determinants of Customer Expectations of Service”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21(1), pp 1-12