Home • PRRES Inc. Journal • Read the Journal

Debates in the Methodology of Economics and the Value of an Environmental Amenity

Author/s: Tom Kauko

Date Published: 1/01/2006

Published in: Volume 12 - 2006 Issue 4 (pages 411 - 425)

Abstract

The article discusses the extent to which the research methodology of heterodox economics is suited to the economic impact analysis of land use and real estate applications. Fulfilling the requirements of context-sensitivity, sub-optimality and pragmatism is argued to be relevant for increasing our conceptual understanding of property value in its multiple dimensions, and consequently for improving the process and outcome of environmental amenity valuation. Here three different issues need to be addressed: (1) the appropriate economic theory framework; (2) the particular geographic and institutional context; (3) the perceived costs vs. benefits of any impacts. Such an analysis is shown in a case study on water valuation in the Netherlands.

Download Full Article

Download the Full Article PDF

14445921.2006.11104218.pdf 14445921.2006.11104218.pdf (190kB)

Keywords

References

  • Adams, D., Dunse, N. and White, M. (2005) Conceptualising State-Market Relations in Land and Property: The Growth of Institutionalism - Extension or Challenge to Mainstream Economics? In D. Adams, C. Watkins and M. White (Eds): Planning, Public Policy & Property Markets (RICS Research), pp. 37-55. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Balchin, P. and Kieve, J. (1977) Urban Land Economics, London: Macmillan.
  • Ball, J. and Srinivasan, V.C. (1994) Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process in House Selection. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 9, pp. 69-85.
  • Ball, M. (1998) Institutions in British Property Research: A Review. Urban Studies, 35:9, pp. 1501-1517.
  • Bender A., Din A., Favarger P., Hoesli M. and Laakso J. (1997) An Analysis of Perceptions Concerning the Environmental Quality of Housing in Geneva. Urban Studies, Vol. 34, No. 3, 503-513.
  • Bender A., Din A., Hoesli M. and Laakso J. (1999) Environmental quality perceptions of urban commercial real estate. Journal of Property Investment and Finance, Vol. 17, No. 3, 280-296.
  • Canonne, J. and Macdonald, R. (2003) Valuation without value theory: A North American “Appraisal”. Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education, 6(1), 113-162
  • Davis, J.B. (2006) The turn in economics: neoclassical dominance to mainstream pluralism? Journal of Institutional Economics, 2, pp. 1-20.
  • Dent, P. and Temple, M. (1998) Economic value - a methodological dilemma? The Cutting Edge 1998 -conference proceedings, ISBN 0-85406-922-4.
  • Din, A., Hoesli, M and Bender, A. (2001) Environmental Variables and Real Estate Prices. Urban Studies, Vol. 38, No. 11, 1989-2000.
  • Evans, A. W. (1983) The Determination of the Price of Land. Urban Studies, 20, pp. 119-129.
  • Garnett, R. F.:Jr. (2005) Whither heterodoxy?, post-autistic economics review, issue no. 34, 30 October, article 1, pp. 2-21, http://www.paecon.net/PAEReview/issue34/Garnett34.htm
  • Goetgeluk, R., Kauko, T. and Priemus, H. (2005) Can Red Pay for Blue? Methods to Estimate the Added Value of Water in Residential Environments, Journal of Environmental Management and Planning, vol. 48, no. 1, January 2005, pp. 103-120.
  • Gregory R. (2000) Valuing Environmental Policy Options: A Case Study Comparison of Multiattribute and Contingent Valuation Survey Methods, Land Economics 76 (2), pp. 151-173.
  • Guerin, B. (2003) Putting a radical socialness into consumer behaviour analysis, Journal of Economic Psychology 24(5), October, pp. 697-718.
  • Hanink, D. M. amd Cromley, R. G. (1998) Land Use Allocation in the Absence of Complete Market Values. Journal of Regional Economics, 38, pp. 465-480.
  • Kauko, T. (2004) Infusing ‘institution’ and ‘agency’ into house price analysis, Urban Studies, Vol. 41, No. 8, July 2004, pp. 1507-1519.
  • Kersloot , J. and Kauko, T. (2004) Measurement of housing preferences - a comparison of research activity in the Netherlands and Finland. Nordic Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Research, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 144-163.
  • King, J. E. (2004) Three Arguments for Pluralism in Economics, post-autistic economics review, issue no. 23, 5 January, article 2, http://www.btinternet.com/~pae_news/review/issue23.htm
  • Laakso, J., Bender, A., Din, A., Favarger, P. and Hoesli, M. (1995) An Analysis of Perceptions Concerning the Evironmental Quality of Residential Real Estate in Geneva, 1th IRES Conference, Stockholm 28 June -1 July, 1995
  • Lawson, T. (1997) Economics and reality. Routledge, London.
  • Maclennan, D. (1982) Housing economics. Longman, New York
  • McCartney, M. (2004) Liberalisation and Social Structure: The Case of Labour Intensive Export Growth in South Asia, post-autistic economics review, issue no. 23, 5 January, article 3, http://www.btinternet.com/~pae_news/review/issue23.htm
  • McCartney, M. (2005) Game Theory: A refinement of an Alternative to Neo-classical economics, post-autistic economics review, issue no. 30, 21 March, article 2, http://www.btinternet.com/~pae_news/review/issue30.htm
  • McLean, D.G. and Mundy, B. (1998) The Addition of Contingent Valuation and Conjoint Analysis to the Required Body of Knowledge for the Estimation of Environmental Damages to Real Property. Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1-19.
  • Meen, D. and Meen, G. (2003) Social Behaviour as a Basis for Modelling the Urban Housing Market: A Review. Urban Studies, 40(5-6), pp. 917-935.
  • Needham, Barrie and de Kam, George (2004) Understanding How Land is Exchanged: Co-ordination Mechanisms and Transaction Costs. Urban Studies, vol. 41, no. 10, September, pp. 2061-2076.
  • Nevalainen, R., Staffans, A. and Vuorela, P. (1990) Asumisen laadun arviointi ja tutkimi-nen. (Evaluating and studying the quality of housing, in Finnish.) YTK B 60, Helsinki.
  • Pardo-Guerra, J. P. (2004) When social physics becomes a social problem: economics, ethics and the new order, post-autistic economics review, issue no. 29, 6 December, article 1, http://www.btinternet.com/~pae_news/review/issue29.htm
  • Pessali, H. F. (2006) The rhetoric of Oliver Williamson’s transaction cost economics. Journal of Institutional Economics, 2, pp. 45-65.
  • Ryan, R. L. (1998) Local perceptions and values for a midwestern river corridor. Landscape and Urban Planning, 42, pp. 225-237.
  • Saaty, T.L. (1990) How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research 48, pp. 9-26.
  • Sager, T. (2003) Rationality types in Evaluation Techniques: The Planning Balance Sheet and the Goals Achievement Matrix, European Journal of Spatial Development, Jan.-no 2; http://www.nordregio.se/EJSD/
  • Small, G. and Sheehan, J. (2005) Valuing your Grandmother: Why customary title is incomparable to Western conceptions of property value. Paper presented at the Paper presented at the 11 PRRES conference, Melbourne, Australia, 23-27 January.
  • Thériault, M., Des Rosiers, F. and Joerin, F. (2005) Modelling accessibility to urban services using fuzzy logic. Journal of Property Investment and Finance, 23:1, pp. 22-54.
  • Tiesdell, S. and Allmendinger, P. (2005) Planning Tools and Markets: Towards an Extended Conceptualisation. In D. Adams, C. Watkins and M. White (Eds): Planning, Public Policy & Property Markets (RICS Research), pp. 56-76. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • van Bouwel, J. (2005) Towards a Framework for Pluralism in Economics, issue no. 30, 21 March, article 3, http://www.btinternet.com/~pae_news/review/issue30.htm
  • Vatn, A. (2004), Environmental Valuation and Rationality, Land Economics, 80(1), February, pp. 1-18.
  • Weston, R. (2002) Towards a realist theory of market sector housing production in England. Paper presented at the European Network of Housing Research Conference Workshops, Vienna, Austria, 1-5 July.
  • Weston, R. (2003) Rhetoric: Methodology or Method? And Other Views from Heterodoxy. Comment on Focus article, Housing, Theory and Society, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 132-133.
  • Zahedi, F. (1986) The Analytic Hierarchy Process - A Survey of the Method and its Applications. Interfaces, 16(4) July-August, pp. 96-108.