An Analysis of the Level of Maturity in South-East Asian Property Markets

Author/s: Henry Chin, Peter Dent

Date Published: 1/01/2005

Published in: Volume 11 - 2005 Issue 4 (pages 355 - 372)

Abstract

Previous literature has argued that mature markets should have the ability to accommodate a full range of use and investment objectives, with the provision of a sophisticated property profession and its associated institutions and networks. As a consequence, maturity level can be seen to influence office investment activities. South-East Asian cities present an interesting array of property markets at various stages of evolution. Where each city is now and where it is heading is the result of a complex mix of underlying factors. This paper attempts to apply the methodology which has been developed in the European context to the South-East Asian market.

Download Full Article

Download the Full Article PDF

14445921.2005.11104192.pdf 14445921.2005.11104192.pdf (283kB)

Keywords

Case Study - Emergent Markets - Mature Markets - Maturity - South-East Asia

References

  • Armitage L. (1995), “Internationalisation of Property Market Process: Emergence of the Bangkok Prime Commercial Office Market”, Paper Presented in the first Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference, Melbourne.
  • Armitage L. (1996), “Constraints to the Operation of Commercial Property Market in South-East Asia”, Paper Presented in RICS Cutting Edge Conference, 1996, Bristol.
  • Arriyavat P. (1997), Thailand. In: Gelbtuch H., Mackmin D. And Milgrim M., ed. Real Estate Valuation in Global Markets, Appraisal Institute, Chicago, pp 301-309.
  • Berry J. and McGreal S. and Scales. P. (1999), Pacific Rim Cities: the relationship between planning system, property markets and real estate investment, In: Berry J. and McGreal S., Ed. Cities in the Pacific Rim: Planning System and Property Markets, E & FN Spon, London, pp. 1-21.
  • CBRE (2003), Bangkok Report.
  • Colliers Jardine (1997), Asia Pacific Business Guide 1997, Colliers Jardine Research, McGraw Hill, Hong Kong.
  • Gordon J.N. (2000), “International Transparency in Real Estate Markets”, Wharton Real Estate Review, Fall, pp. 19-26.
  • Gwartney J. D. and Lawson R. A. (2003), Economic Freedom of the World: 2003 Annual Report, The Fraser Institute, Canada.
  • Jones Lang Wootton (JLW) Research (1995), Report Property Market, various issues.
  • Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) Research (1997), Asia Pacific Property Digest, various issues.
  • Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) Research (2001), Asia Pacific Property Digest, various issues.
  • Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) Research (2002), Asia Pacific Property Digest, various issues.
  • Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) Research (2003), Report Property Market, various issues.
  • Jarvis D. (2003), International Business Risk: Handbook for the Asia-Pacific Region, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Keogh G. (1991), “Use and Investment Markets in British Real Estate”, Journal of Property Valuation and Investment, 12 (4), pp. 58-72.
  • Keogh G. and D’Arcy E. (1994), “Market Maturity and Property market Behaviour: A European Comparison of Mature and Emerging Market”, Journal of Property Research, 11 (3), pp. 215-235.
  • Keogh G. and D’Arcy E. (1999), Singapore, In: Berry J. and McGreal S., Ed. Cities in the Pacific Rim: Planning System and Property Markets, E & FN Spon, London, pp. 169-185.
  • Knight Frank Research, (1997) Asia Pacific Property Review, various issues.
  • Kotier P. and Kartajaya H. (2000), Repositioning Asia: From Bubble to Sustainable Economy, John Wiley & Sons, Singapore.
  • Lee S. (1999), The European Real Estate Market, Paper Presented at International Real Estate Society Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  • Lee S. (2001), The Risk of Investing in Real Estate Markets of the Asian Region, Working Paper in Department of Land Management and Development, June, pp 30-59, The University of Reading
  • Lim C. L. (2000), PhD Thesis: Property Investor Behaviour and Perception of Investment in Southeast Asia with Particular Reference to Singapore, University of Ulster, Ireland.
  • Lim C. L., Adair A and McGreal S (2002), “The Perception of Real Estate Investment Opportunity in Southeast Asid”, Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp 163 - 182.
  • Schultz C. (1990), “EmergingMarkets: Opportunities, Risk in the Pacific Rim”, Pension World, December, pp.10 - 13.
  • Seek N. H. (1996a), “Institutional Participation in the Asia Pacific Real Estate Markets: Are Benefits Worth the Risks?”, Real Estate Finance, 12 (4) Winter, pp. 51 - 58.
  • Seek N. H. (1996b), “Institutional Participation in Asia Pacific Real Estate Markets: Are the Benefits Worth the Risks?”, Building Owner and Manager, July 1996, pp. 104 - 107.
  • Tse Y.C. (1997), “An Application of the ARIMA model to Real Estate Prices in Hong Kong”, Journal of Property Finance, 8(2), pp. 152 - 163.
  • Walker A and Chung L. W. (1990), Hong Kong: Property, Construction and the Economy, RICS, London.
  • Walker A. and Flanagan R. (1991), Property and Construction in Asia Pacific: Hong Kong, Japan, Singapore, Blackwell, Oxford.
  • Yu S. and Lee A. (1997), Singapore. In Gelbtuch H., Mackmin D. And Milgrim M., ed. Real Estate Valuation in Global Markets, Appraisal Institute, Chicago, pp 321-334.