Home • PRRES Inc. Journal • Read the Journal

Property Implications of the Separation of Land and Water Rights

Author/s: Henning Bjornlund, Brian O’Callaghan

Date Published: 1/01/2004

Published in: Volume 10 - 2004 Issue 1 (pages 54 - 78)

Abstract

During the 1980s and 1990s, water markets emerged as the preferred means of reallocating existing water between competing users. This has split the traditionally linked water and land assets into two separate and tradeable components. Reflecting this, most jurisdictions now have legislation formally separating property rights in water and land. Water is not any longer a fixture of land but a personal chattel; this transformation has profound implications for water as a collateral for lending, as a value component when valuing an irrigation property, and as a base for rates, taxes and duties as well as equity implications.

Download Full Article

Download the Full Article PDF

14445921.2004.11104154.pdf 14445921.2004.11104154.pdf (886kB)

Keywords

Transferable Water Rights - Valuation of Water Rights - Water Markets - Water Rights

References

  • Achterstraat, P. 2001. Revenue ruling DUT 023 transactions relating to water rights. URL:http://www.osr.nsw.gov.au/revrules/rrdut023.htm.
  • Bjornlund, H. 1999. Water trade policies as a component of environmentally, socially and economically sustainable water use in rural Southeastern Australia. Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of doctor of philosophy, University of South Australia, Adelaide.
  • Bjornlund, H. 2000. To regulate or to market – striking the balance for sustainable water use. Proceedings from the joint Water and the Law symposium, Adelaide 18 October, 11–17.
  • Bjornlund, H. 2001. Water policies and rural land values. Paper presented at the 7 Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference, Adelaide, January. URL: http://www.business.unisa.edu.au/prres
  • Bjornlund, H. 2002a. The adoption, perception and impact of the new water policy paradigm within two Australian states. Proceedings from the World Bank conference Irrigation water policies: micro and macro considerations, Agadir, June 15–17. URL: http://www.worldbank.agadirconference.com
  • Bjornlund, H. 2002b.: What impedes water markets? Proceedings from the 4 Australasian Natural Resources Law and Policy Conference: Water Law and Policy. Sydney 24–25 October.
  • Bjornlund, H. 2002c. The land/water market price relationships. Paper presented on the Valuation of Irrigation Property and Water Right Seminar held by the Australian Property Institute and the Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Melbourne, October.
  • Bjornlund, H. 2002d. The socio-economic structures of irrigation communities— water markets and the structural adjustment process. Journal of Rural Society, 12(2), 123–147.
  • Bjornlund, H. 2003a. Farmer participation in markets for temporary and permanent water in South Eastern Australia. International Journal of Agricultural Water Management, 63, 57–76.
  • Bjornlund, H. 2003b. Efficient water market mechanisms to cope with water scarcity. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 19(4),553–568.
  • Bjornlund, H. and McKay, J. 1998. Overcoming the introspective legacy of tradeable water entitlement policies in South Eastern Australia. In Just, R. and Netanyahu, S. (eds.) Conflict and Cooperation on Trans-Boundary Water Resources. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Natural Resource Management and Policy Series, 315–332.
  • Proceedings from the 1 Australasian Natural Resources law and Policy Conference – Focus on Water
  • Proceedings from 1 Australasian Natural Resources Law and Policy Conference – Focus on Water
  • Checchio, E. and Colby, B.G. 1988. Refining the water transfer process: innovations for western states. In Shupe, S.J. (ed.) Water Marketing 1988 – The Move to Innovation, Denver: University of Denver College of Law, Chapter 3, 132.
  • Conference Proceedings 3 Australasian Natural Resources Law and Policy Conference -Focus on Water
  • Colby, S.B., McGinnis, M.A. and Rait, K. 1989. Procedural aspects of state water law: transferring water rights in the western states. Arizona Law Review, 31(4), 697–720.
  • Council of Australian Governments. 1994. Communiqué. Meeting of COAG in Hobart 25 February 1994.
  • Cummings, B.A. 1990. Water transfer: the New South Wales experience. In Pigram, J.J. and Hooper, B.P. (eds). Transferability of Water Entitlements. Proceedings from an International Seminar and Workshop, The Centre for Water Policy Research, Armidale, NSE, July, 183–200.
  • Curd, V. and Schonfeldt C. 1990. Water transfers: the South Australian experience, in Pigram, J.J. and Hooper B.P. (eds.) Transferability of Water Entitlements, Proceedings of an International Seminar and Workshop, The Centre for Water Policy Research, Armidale, NSW, July, 201–211.
  • Department of Water Resources. 1986. Irrigation management study. Report No. 13, Water Resource Management Report Series.
  • DLWC, Department of Land and Water Conservation. 1999. A White paper. A proposal for updated and consolidated water management legislation in New South Wales. Sydney, DLWC.
  • DNRE, Department or Natural Resources and Environment. 2001. The value of water – a guide to water trading in Victoria. Melbourne DNRE.
  • Fenwick, T.D. 1984. Transferable water rights: a Queensland viewpoint. Proceeding of the joint AWRC and AAES Seminar on Transferable Water Rights, Melbourne, Australian Government Printing Service, Canberra
  • Fenwick, T.D. 1990. Water allocation, and transfer practices in Queensland. In Pigram, J.J. and Hooper B.P. (eds.) Transferability of Water Entitlements. Proceedings from an International Seminar and Workshop, The Centre for Water Policy Research, Armidale, NSW, July, 215–221.
  • Langford, K.J. and Foley, B.E. 1990. Transferable water entitlements: Victorian perspective. In Pigram, J.J. and Hooper, B.P. (eds.) Transferability of Water Entitlements, Proceedings of an International Seminar and Workshop, The Centre for Water Policy Research, Armidale, NSW, 201–214.
  • Marsden Jacob. 1999. Water trading development and monitoring. Report to the Department of Land and Water Conservation. Camberwell, Victoria, Marsden Jacob & Associates.
  • MDBC, Murray–Darling Basin Commission. 1997. Media Release – Ministerial Council reports on diversion cap. Canberra, MDBC.
  • MDBMC, Murray–Darling Basin Ministerial Council. 2002. The living Murray: a discussion paper on restoring the health of the River Murray. Canberra MDBMC.
  • MDBMC, Murray–Darling Basin Ministerial Council. 1998. Review of cap implementation 1997/98. Report of the Independent Audit Group. Including Responses by the Four State Governments, Canberra MDBMC.
  • MDBMC, Murray–Darling Basin Ministerial Council. 1997. Review of cap implementation 1996/97. Report of the Independent Audit Group, Canberra MDBMC.
  • MDBMC, Murray-Darling Basin Ministerial Council. 1996. Setting the cap. Report of the Independent Audit Group, Canberra, MDBMC.
  • MDBMC, Murray-Darling Basin Ministerial Council. 1995. An audit of water use in the Murray-Darling Basin. Canberra, MDBMC.
  • Morgan, T. 1990. Water transfers: an irrigation industry perspective. In Pigram, J.J. and Hooper B.P. (eds.) Transferability of Water Entitlements. Proceedings from an International Seminar and Workshop, The Centre for Water Policy Research, Armidale, NSW, July, 237–241.
  • NRM, Natural Resources and Mines. 2002a. Overview Report and Draft Plan – Border Rivers Draft Water Resource Plan. NRM, Brisbane.
  • NRM, Natural Resources and Mines. 2002b. Overview Report and Draft Plan – Moonie Draft Water Resource Plan. NRM, Brisbane.
  • NRM, Natural Resources and Mines. 2002c. Overview Report and Draft Plan – Warrego, Paroo, Bullo and Nebine Draft Water Resource Plan. NRM, Brisbane.
  • NRM, Natural Resources and Mines. 2002d. Evaluation of the permanent water trading trial in Mareeba. Water Trading Discussion Paper. NRM, Brisbane.
  • NRQ, Natural Resources Queensland. 1999. Exposure Draft Bill and Explanatory material (Water Allocation and Management) Bill. NRQ, Brisbane.
  • Proceedings from 4 Australasian Water Policy and Law Conference
  • Randall, A. 1981. Property entitlements and pricing policies for a maturing water economy. The Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 25(3), 195–220.
  • Rice, T.A. and MacDonnell, L.J. 1993. Agricultural to Urban Water Transfers in Colorado: An Assessment of the Issues and Options. NRLC Research Report Series, Natural Resources Law Center. Boulder: University of Colorado.
  • Richmond, P. 2002. Watertight security: a lenders perspective. Paper presented on the Valuation of Irrigation Property and Water Right Seminar held by the Australian Property Institute and the Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Melbourne, October.
  • RMCWMB, River Murray Catchment Water Management Board. 2002. Water Allocation Plan for the River Murray prescribed Watercourse. RMCWMB.
  • Sitarz, D. 1993. AGENDA 21: The Earth Summit Strategy to Save Our Planet. Boulder: Earth Press.
  • Sturgess, G.L. and Wright, M. 1993. Water rights in rural New South Wales. The evolution of a property rights system. CIS Policy Monographs 26, St. Leonards, NSW, Centre for Independent Studies.
  • Tan, Poh-Ling. 1999. Water licences and property rights: the legal principles for compensation in Queensland. Environmental and Planning Law Journal, 16(4),
  • Thomas, G.N. 1984, Transferable water rights: a horticultural industries perspective – the Riverland example. Proceedings from the joint AWRC and AAES Seminar on Transferable Water Rights, Melbourne. 65–84.
  • Tuckwell, H.T. 1984. Transferability of water rights in South Australia. Proceedings from the joint AWRC and AAES Seminar on Transferable Water Rights, Melbourne. 65–84.
  • World Bank. 1993. Water resources management. A World Bank Policy Paper, Washington: World Bank.
  • World Commission on the Environment and Development. 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, Melbourne.
  • Young, M.D. and McColl, J.C. 2002. Robust separation: a search for a generic framework to simplify registration and trading of interests in natural resources. CSIRO Land and Water, Policy and Economic Research Unit, Adelaide.
  • Young, M., Young, D., Hamilton, A., and Bright, M. 2002. A preliminary assessment of the economic and social implications of environmental flow scenarios for the Murray River system. A Report prepared for the Murray Darling Basin Commission by CSIRO Land and Water, Adelaide.
  • Young, M., Hatton McDonald, D., Stringer, R. and Bjornlund, H. 2000. Inter-state water trading: a two year review. Report to the Murray Darling Basin Commission, Adelaide CSIRO Land and Water.