Home • PRRES Inc. Journal • Read the Journal

Client Perceptions of the Quality of Valuation Reports in Australia

Author/s: Graeme Newell

Date Published: 1/01/2004

Published in: Volume 10 - 2004 Issue 4 (pages 437 - 450)

Abstract

A survey of external users of commercial valuation reports was conducted in April 2004 to assess client perceptions of the quality of valuation reports in Australia. This 2004 survey highlighted the further consolidation and improvement in the quality of valuation reports that has occurred over recent years, reflected in the significant increase in the use of DCF analysis and higher levels of client satisfaction in valuations for all commercial property sectors. Continued concerns were raised over the failure to understand the complexities and market position of particular projects and the need for a greater emphasis on the current supply/demand situation.

Download Full Article

Download the Full Article PDF

14445921.2004.11104170.pdf 14445921.2004.11104170.pdf (205kB)

Keywords

Client Satisfaction - Dcf Analysis - Valuation Quality - Valuation Reports - Valuation Standards

References

  • Adair, A. et al. (1996). An analysis of valuation variation in the UK commercial property market: Hager and Lord revisited. Journal of Property Valuation and Investment 14(5): 34–47.
  • Australian Property Institute. (2004). Professional Practice 2004. Australian Property Institute: Canberra.
  • Australian Property Institute. (2003). Risk Management Module. Australian Property Institute: Canberra (www.nat.propertyinstitute.com.au).
  • Bechtold, B. and Johnson, R. (1989). Statistics for Business and Economics. PWS-Kent: Boston.
  • Boyd, T. and Irons, J. (2002). Valuation variance and negligence: the importance of reasonable care. Pacific Rim Property Research Journal 8(2): 107–126.
  • Brown, G. et al. (1998). Valuation uncertainty and the Mallinson Report. Journal of Property Research 15(1): 1–13.
  • Burgess, K. (2004). Value’s new meaning. Commercial Property Gazette (July): 22–23.
  • Carsberg Report. (2002). Property Valuation. Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors: London.
  • Colwell, P. and Trefzger, J. (1992). Impact of regulation on appraisal quality. The Appraisal Journal (July): 428–429.
  • Crosby, N. (2000). Valuation accuracy, variation, and bias in the context of standards and expectations. Journal of Property Investment and Finance 18(2): 130–161.
  • Crosby, N., Lavers, A. and Murdoch, J. (1998). Property valuation variation and the “margin of error” in the UK. Journal of Property Research 15(4): 305–330.
  • Crosby, N., Newell, G., Matysiak, G., French, N. and Rodney, B. (1997). Client perception of property investment valuation reports in the UK. Journal of Property Research 14(1): 27–48.
  • Dotzour, M. and Le Compte, R. (1993). Lender perceptions of appraisal quality after FIRREA. The Appraisal Journal (April): 227–233.
  • IVSC. (2000). International Valuation Standards. (2000). International Valuation Standards Committee.
  • Knitter, R. (1993). What clients want from appraisal reports. The Appraisal Journal
  • (April): 272–276.
  • Knitter, R. (1994). 1993 survey of appraisal clients. The Appraisal Journal (January): 113–117.
  • Knitter, R. (1995). 1994 survey of appraisal clients. The Appraisal Journal (April): 213–219.
  • Lahey, K., Ott, D. and Lahey, V. (1993). Survey of the effects of state certification on appraisers. The Appraisal Journal (July): 405–413.
  • Mallinson, M. and French, N. (2000). Uncertainty in property valuation. Journal of Property Investment and Finance 18(1): 13–32.
  • Mallinson Report. (1994). Commercial Property Valuation. Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors: London.
  • McParland, C., Adair, A. and McGreal, S. (2002). Valuation standards: a comparison of four European countries. Journal of Property Investment and Finance 20(2): 127–141.
  • Newell, G. (1995). The quality of valuation reports. The Valuer and Land Economist 33(5): 358–360.
  • Newell, G. (1999). The quality of valuation reports in Australia: 1998. Australian Property Journal 35(7): 605–608.
  • Newell, G. (2004). Assessing professional valuation practice standards. Australian Property Journal (in press).
  • Newell, G. and Barrett, V. (1990). The quality of valuation reports. The Valuer 31(2): 96–98.
  • Newell, G. and Fibbens, M. (1991). Professional valuation practice standards in NSW. The Valuer 31(4): 382–385.
  • Newell, G. and Kishore, R. (1998). Are valuations an effective proxy for property sales? The Valuer and Land Economist 31(4): 150–153.
  • Parker, D. (1999). A note on valuation accuracy: an Australian case-study. Journal of Property Investment and Finance 17(4): 401–411.
  • Parker, D. (2001). Observations on trends in institutional property valuations. Australian Property Journal 36(5): 426–429.
  • Parker, D. (2004). DCF1 – how does the property fund management industry do discounted cash flow? Australian Property Journal 38(1): 21–27.
  • Parker, D. and Robinson, J. (2000). A brief history of the Australian DCF practice standard. Journal of Property Investment and Finance 18(2): 196–211.
  • Preston, G. (2004). President’s message. API News 10(5): 1–2.
  • Property Council of Australia. (2003). 2003 People in Property. PCA: Sydney.
  • Property Investment Research. (2003). Australian Property Funds Industry Survey 2003. PIR: Melbourne.
  • Rothwell, G. (1990). Valuation standards. The Valuer 31(4): 224–228.
  • Rothwell, G. (1991). Valuations: the new perspective. The Valuer 31(7): 474–477.
  • Rothwell, G. (1994). Valuation methodology and market needs. The Valuer and Land Economist 33(1): 18–20.
  • RICS. (2003). RICS Appraisal and Valuation Standards. Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors: London.
  • Rudolph, P. (1994). Will bad appraisers drive out good? The Appraisal Journal (July): 363–366.
  • Shlaes, J. (1993). The quality appraisal report. The Appraisal Journal (Oct): 483–488.
  • Smith, B. (1994). Client expectations of valuers and valuations. The Valuer and Land Economist 33(2): 131–132.
  • TEGOVA. (2000). European Valuation Standards 2000. Estates Gazette: London.
  • Tosh, D. and Rayburn, W. (1999). Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. Dearborn: Chicago.
  • Wilson, D. (1996). Are appraisal reports logical fallacies? The Appraisal Journal (April): 129–133.
  • Waters Report. (2000). Valuers’ Compliance with the Reporting Standards of the RICS Red Book. Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors: London.